American
Men -
Women
2011
-
2012 -
2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
306 |
Mark Allen |
SR |
32:29 |
440 |
John Pope |
JR |
32:47 |
530 |
Nick Reagan |
SO |
32:59 |
610 |
Mark Leininger |
SR |
33:08 |
842 |
Constantine Matsakis |
JR |
33:31 |
1,371 |
Tom Woermer |
SO |
34:18 |
1,988 |
Hunter Lussi |
FR |
35:15 |
2,107 |
Brandon Latham |
FR |
35:26 |
2,204 |
Ian Lutz |
SO |
35:32 |
2,439 |
Bernard Skomal |
FR |
36:01 |
2,625 |
David McCombs |
FR |
36:30 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
20.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
94.9% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Mark Allen |
John Pope |
Nick Reagan |
Mark Leininger |
Constantine Matsakis |
Tom Woermer |
Hunter Lussi |
Brandon Latham |
Ian Lutz |
Bernard Skomal |
David McCombs |
Mason Invitational |
09/29 |
1071 |
|
32:16 |
33:09 |
33:06 |
|
34:10 |
35:15 |
35:27 |
35:21 |
36:18 |
36:31 |
Leopard Invitational |
10/13 |
1110 |
33:04 |
33:08 |
33:21 |
33:19 |
33:52 |
33:53 |
|
|
34:54 |
35:42 |
|
Patriot League Championships |
10/27 |
1036 |
32:22 |
33:41 |
32:58 |
33:07 |
33:32 |
35:03 |
|
|
36:57 |
|
|
Mid-Atlantic Region |
11/09 |
854 |
32:07 |
32:15 |
32:24 |
33:02 |
33:13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship |
11/17 |
|
32:36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.1% |
30.3 |
787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
Region Championship |
100% |
7.2 |
218 |
|
|
0.2 |
4.2 |
15.6 |
18.2 |
20.1 |
17.2 |
13.2 |
6.1 |
3.0 |
1.6 |
0.5 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Mark Allen |
11.8% |
169.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Pope |
1.0% |
194.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nick Reagan |
0.1% |
219.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Leininger |
0.1% |
211.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constantine Matsakis |
0.1% |
240.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Woermer |
0.1% |
251.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hunter Lussi |
0.1% |
252.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Mark Allen |
20.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.8 |
1.1 |
1.9 |
2.3 |
2.6 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
4.1 |
4.3 |
4.2 |
4.6 |
4.4 |
4.1 |
4.0 |
3.7 |
3.4 |
3.3 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
2.6 |
John Pope |
31.3 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
2.2 |
2.4 |
2.4 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
3.1 |
3.0 |
3.4 |
Nick Reagan |
39.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
1.9 |
1.3 |
Mark Leininger |
45.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
Constantine Matsakis |
65.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tom Woermer |
103.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hunter Lussi |
136.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
0.2% |
37.5% |
| |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
3 |
4 |
4.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
15.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
18.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
20.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
17.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
13.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
6.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
3.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
1.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
0.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
99.9 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |