Campbell
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
566  Morgan Timiney JR 33:03
1,130  Evan Darm SO 33:58
1,385  Chris Schulist JR 34:19
1,550  Delohnni Nicol-Samuel SR 34:33
1,569  Eric Baldwin JR 34:34
2,467  Michael Bedell SO 36:05
2,755  Colin Lavigne SR 36:56
2,939  Clay Woll JR 37:49
2,980  Jordan Usher FR 38:05
National Rank #167 of 311
Southeast Region Rank #23 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 22nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 10.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Morgan Timiney Evan Darm Chris Schulist Delohnni Nicol-Samuel Eric Baldwin Michael Bedell Colin Lavigne Clay Woll Jordan Usher
Charlotte Invitational (Gold) 09/28 1227 33:11 33:52 34:58 34:42 35:45 38:31 38:06
Pre-Nationals Meet (Black) 10/13 1186 33:06 33:50 33:54 35:09 34:27 36:11 37:20
Big South Championship 10/27 1172 32:54 34:21 34:19 33:51 34:37 36:18 36:57





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 22.6 672 0.0 0.0 0.3 1.0 2.4 6.3 14.5 30.2 19.2 10.6 6.8 4.8 2.2 1.1 0.5 0.1 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Morgan Timiney 69.7
Evan Darm 123.0
Chris Schulist 145.7
Delohnni Nicol-Samuel 158.6
Eric Baldwin 159.7
Michael Bedell 239.4
Colin Lavigne 264.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 0.0% 0.0 16
17 0.3% 0.3 17
18 1.0% 1.0 18
19 2.4% 2.4 19
20 6.3% 6.3 20
21 14.5% 14.5 21
22 30.2% 30.2 22
23 19.2% 19.2 23
24 10.6% 10.6 24
25 6.8% 6.8 25
26 4.8% 4.8 26
27 2.2% 2.2 27
28 1.1% 1.1 28
29 0.5% 0.5 29
30 0.1% 0.1 30
31 0.0% 0.0 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0