Furman
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
357  Wilkerson Given SR 32:35
443  Tripp Hurt SO 32:47
1,318  Tyler Greathouse JR 34:13
1,441  Jack Klecker JR 34:24
1,857  Jack Morgan SO 35:03
1,906  Bradley Gossett FR 35:07
1,965  Stuart Graham SO 35:13
2,324  Jack Miller 35:45
2,578  William Ivey SO 36:21
National Rank #118 of 311
Southeast Region Rank #18 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 20th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 68.7%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Wilkerson Given Tripp Hurt Tyler Greathouse Jack Klecker Jack Morgan Bradley Gossett Stuart Graham Jack Miller William Ivey
Pre-Nationals Meet (Black) 10/13 1169 33:19 33:00 33:59 34:34 35:14 34:56 35:15 35:52
Southern Conference Championships 10/27 1125 32:36 32:51 34:36 34:32 35:00 35:20 35:12 35:46 36:53
Southeast Region Championships 11/09 998 31:58 32:23 34:08 33:58 34:56 35:04





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 19.5 578 0.2 0.7 1.7 4.4 8.3 13.2 17.9 22.2 20.5 7.5 2.2 0.9 0.2 0.0 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Wilkerson Given 42.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.1 1.1 1.5 1.8
Tripp Hurt 52.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3
Tyler Greathouse 139.9
Jack Klecker 149.9
Jack Morgan 186.6
Bradley Gossett 190.6
Stuart Graham 195.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 0.2% 0.2 13
14 0.7% 0.7 14
15 1.7% 1.7 15
16 4.4% 4.4 16
17 8.3% 8.3 17
18 13.2% 13.2 18
19 17.9% 17.9 19
20 22.2% 22.2 20
21 20.5% 20.5 21
22 7.5% 7.5 22
23 2.2% 2.2 23
24 0.9% 0.9 24
25 0.2% 0.2 25
26 0.0% 0.0 26
27 0.0% 0.0 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0