Mercer
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
923  Lukas Steinheber SO 33:39
1,082  Jacob Law SR 33:54
1,691  Sony Prosper JR 34:45
1,821  Hunter Honeycutt FR 35:00
1,865  Andrew Weems SR 35:03
2,221  Davis Trexler SO 35:33
2,507  Kasib Abdullah JR 36:10
2,521  Austin Pfeifer SO 36:12
3,076  Jeff Law SO 38:47
National Rank #199 of 311
South Region Rank #19 of 42
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.1%
Top 20 in Regional 71.9%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Lukas Steinheber Jacob Law Sony Prosper Hunter Honeycutt Andrew Weems Davis Trexler Kasib Abdullah Austin Pfeifer Jeff Law
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 09/29 1235 33:41 34:20 34:37 34:43 35:31 35:20 35:42 36:23 37:43
Will Wilson Invitational 10/13 1233 33:40 34:18 34:38 34:57 35:04 35:23 35:26 36:10 39:00
Atlantic Sun Championships 10/27 1236 34:06 33:36 34:50 35:24 34:46 36:14 36:50 35:52 39:30
South Region Championships 11/09 1217 33:18 33:24 34:58 35:06 34:54 36:43 36:20





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 18.6 505 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.0 2.5 4.2 7.1 9.7 11.4 12.9 11.8 10.9 9.3 7.5 5.7 3.9 1.7 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Lukas Steinheber 49.9 0.0 0.0 0.1
Jacob Law 62.8
Sony Prosper 114.6
Hunter Honeycutt 129.9
Andrew Weems 133.6
Davis Trexler 164.1
Kasib Abdullah 188.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 0.0% 0.0 9
10 0.1% 0.1 10
11 0.4% 0.4 11
12 1.0% 1.0 12
13 2.5% 2.5 13
14 4.2% 4.2 14
15 7.1% 7.1 15
16 9.7% 9.7 16
17 11.4% 11.4 17
18 12.9% 12.9 18
19 11.8% 11.8 19
20 10.9% 10.9 20
21 9.3% 9.3 21
22 7.5% 7.5 22
23 5.7% 5.7 23
24 3.9% 3.9 24
25 1.7% 1.7 25
26 0.1% 0.1 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0