UTSA
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
541  Mike Medrano SO 33:00
1,048  Harvinder Singh SO 33:50
1,056  Kyle Hawley JR 33:51
1,228  Daniel Balbontin SR 34:05
1,402  Nathan Collier JR 34:21
1,656  David Guillen FR 34:42
1,930  Tony Jaramillo FR 35:09
2,689  Brady Hand SO 36:42
2,727  Ivan Garcia SR 36:51
National Rank #146 of 311
South Central Region Rank #11 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 11th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 28.3%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Mike Medrano Harvinder Singh Kyle Hawley Daniel Balbontin Nathan Collier David Guillen Tony Jaramillo Brady Hand Ivan Garcia
Grass Routes Run Festival 09/29 1187 33:14 33:54 34:31 34:38 34:40 33:56 35:49 37:07
Chile Pepper Festival 10/13 1178 33:18 33:50 33:31 34:31 34:23 35:03 36:30 36:52
WAC Championships 10/27 33:36 34:21 35:17
South Central Region Championships 11/09 1137 32:43 33:48 33:49 34:22 34:00 35:19 34:56





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 11.5 340 0.1 0.2 0.5 3.9 23.7 25.0 21.1 14.6 7.7 3.2 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Mike Medrano 34.9 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.2 2.3 2.6
Harvinder Singh 65.2
Kyle Hawley 65.4
Daniel Balbontin 76.6
Nathan Collier 88.4
David Guillen 103.4
Tony Jaramillo 119.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 0.1% 0.1 6
7 0.2% 0.2 7
8 0.5% 0.5 8
9 3.9% 3.9 9
10 23.7% 23.7 10
11 25.0% 25.0 11
12 21.1% 21.1 12
13 14.6% 14.6 13
14 7.7% 7.7 14
15 3.2% 3.2 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0