VCU
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
545  Brenden Leavitt SR 33:01
1,003  Mohamed Adam SO 33:47
1,767  Sam Hush SO 34:54
1,788  Justin Kendall 34:56
1,996  Khalid Khamis SO 35:16
2,152  Justin Kendall JR 35:29
2,474  Matthew Earman SO 36:06
2,686  Alex Hinton SR 36:42
2,772  Berham McDowell SO 37:02
2,802  Corey Scott JR 37:09
National Rank #180 of 311
Southeast Region Rank #26 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 24th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.5%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Brenden Leavitt Mohamed Adam Sam Hush Justin Kendall Khalid Khamis Justin Kendall Matthew Earman Alex Hinton Berham McDowell Corey Scott
Lehigh Paul Short Run (Gold) 09/28 1187 32:38 33:58 34:48 34:58 35:21 34:58 36:12 36:07 37:18 36:59
Christopher Newport University Invite 10/13 1239 33:48 33:49 34:42 34:55 35:30 34:55 36:36 36:33 37:02 36:51
Atlantic 10 Championships 10/27 1203 32:55 33:38 35:10 34:57 35:05 34:57 35:51 37:46 36:53 37:42
Southeast Region Championships 11/09 33:21 33:49





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 25.3 745 0.0 0.0 0.4 1.7 7.1 13.0 16.2 16.0 15.0 12.6 10.3 5.9 1.3 0.3



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Brenden Leavitt 66.3 0.0 0.0
Mohamed Adam 111.6
Sam Hush 177.5
Justin Kendall 181.0
Khalid Khamis 198.7
Justin Kendall 211.1
Matthew Earman 240.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 0.0% 0.0 18
19 0.0% 0.0 19
20 0.4% 0.4 20
21 1.7% 1.7 21
22 7.1% 7.1 22
23 13.0% 13.0 23
24 16.2% 16.2 24
25 16.0% 16.0 25
26 15.0% 15.0 26
27 12.6% 12.6 27
28 10.3% 10.3 28
29 5.9% 5.9 29
30 1.3% 1.3 30
31 0.3% 0.3 31
32 0.1% 0.1 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0