Mississippi
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
642  Max Holman JR 33:16
661  Robert Domanic FR 33:17
675  Ian Carter SO 33:19
1,008  Trevor Gilley FR 33:52
1,767  Ryan Smith SO 34:55
1,796  Jon Luke Watts FR 34:58
1,992  Will Spiers FR 35:19
National Rank #146 of 311
South Region Rank #14 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 14th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 21.6%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Max Holman Robert Domanic Ian Carter Trevor Gilley Ryan Smith Jon Luke Watts Will Spiers
Virginia Panorama Farms Invitational 09/28 1184 33:48 34:08 33:11 34:17 35:07 34:50 37:25
Pre-National Invitational (White) 10/19 1167 33:18 33:18 33:43 34:21 34:14 35:22 35:38
SEC Championships 11/01 1141 33:11 33:44 33:12 33:30 34:58 34:59 34:29
South Region Championships 11/15 1086 32:58 32:36 33:19 33:24 35:17 34:44 34:46





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 12.8 341 0.0 0.3 1.4 3.6 6.9 9.4 11.0 13.2 13.1 13.4 10.3 8.3 5.3 2.7 0.9 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Max Holman 41.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.7 0.7 1.2 1.3 1.6 1.4
Robert Domanic 42.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.5
Ian Carter 43.8 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.2
Trevor Gilley 72.7
Ryan Smith 131.0
Jon Luke Watts 132.9
Will Spiers 145.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 0.0% 0.0 5
6 0.3% 0.3 6
7 1.4% 1.4 7
8 3.6% 3.6 8
9 6.9% 6.9 9
10 9.4% 9.4 10
11 11.0% 11.0 11
12 13.2% 13.2 12
13 13.1% 13.1 13
14 13.4% 13.4 14
15 10.3% 10.3 15
16 8.3% 8.3 16
17 5.3% 5.3 17
18 2.7% 2.7 18
19 0.9% 0.9 19
20 0.1% 0.1 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0