Nebraska
Men -
Women
2012
-
2013 -
2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
513 |
Jarren Heng |
SR |
33:01 |
530 |
Trevor Vidlak |
SR |
33:03 |
554 |
Joe Harter |
FR |
33:06 |
639 |
Jacob Olson |
SO |
33:16 |
687 |
Jonah Heng |
SO |
33:20 |
783 |
Lucas Keifer |
FR |
33:30 |
805 |
Matthew Bloch |
SO |
33:33 |
810 |
Matt Gilbert |
SO |
33:33 |
1,039 |
Connor Gibson |
JR |
33:54 |
1,133 |
Christian Martin |
FR |
34:03 |
1,254 |
Pat Letz |
FR |
34:12 |
1,390 |
Peter Spinks |
FR |
34:22 |
1,695 |
Nolan Border |
SO |
34:48 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
23.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Jarren Heng |
Trevor Vidlak |
Joe Harter |
Jacob Olson |
Jonah Heng |
Lucas Keifer |
Matthew Bloch |
Matt Gilbert |
Connor Gibson |
Christian Martin |
Pat Letz |
Roy Griak Invitational (Gold) |
09/28 |
1053 |
33:20 |
32:44 |
33:38 |
33:03 |
33:13 |
33:10 |
|
33:40 |
33:24 |
33:57 |
34:13 |
South Dakota Tim Young Invite |
10/19 |
1006 |
32:54 |
|
32:49 |
|
32:55 |
34:31 |
33:53 |
33:20 |
|
34:09 |
|
Big Ten Championships |
11/03 |
1104 |
33:10 |
33:19 |
33:06 |
33:23 |
33:23 |
|
33:24 |
33:34 |
34:24 |
34:05 |
|
Midwest Region Championships |
11/15 |
1032 |
32:30 |
33:05 |
32:50 |
33:23 |
33:43 |
|
|
33:31 |
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
11.8 |
348 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
1.8 |
5.8 |
15.1 |
22.4 |
23.5 |
15.4 |
9.2 |
4.6 |
1.5 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Jarren Heng |
62.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
Trevor Vidlak |
63.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
Joe Harter |
66.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
Jacob Olson |
76.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jonah Heng |
80.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lucas Keifer |
89.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew Bloch |
91.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
0.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
1.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
5.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
15.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
22.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
23.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
15.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
9.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
4.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
1.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |