UL-Monroe
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,230  Dusan Makevic FR 34:09
1,372  Silah Chumba JR 34:21
1,410  Hillary Kirwa JR 34:24
1,807  Vinnie VanPuyvelde FR 34:58
2,362  Brent Turner FR 36:04
2,785  Jonathan Jeffcoat FR 37:25
3,073  Dominique Cheffin FR 39:28
3,160  Lane Perilloux FR 40:58
3,259  Andre Brown SO 44:34
National Rank #199 of 311
South Central Region Rank #16 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 15th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 92.3%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Dusan Makevic Silah Chumba Hillary Kirwa Vinnie VanPuyvelde Brent Turner Jonathan Jeffcoat Dominique Cheffin Lane Perilloux Andre Brown
Chile Pepper Festival 10/05 1260 33:39 34:19 34:25 35:21 36:12 36:47
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/18 1250 34:14 34:20 33:51 34:47 36:04 37:20 39:29 41:45 44:34
Sun Belt Conference Championships 11/02 1291 33:57 35:25 35:36 35:03 35:26 38:38 39:28 40:17
South Central Region Championships 11/15 1271 35:02 33:47 34:15 34:47 36:35





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 17.2 521 0.1 25.7 20.6 16.5 12.3 9.7 7.3 4.7 2.1 0.7 0.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Dusan Makevic 75.1
Silah Chumba 84.8
Hillary Kirwa 87.1
Vinnie VanPuyvelde 111.8
Brent Turner 152.4
Jonathan Jeffcoat 183.9
Dominique Cheffin 212.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 25.7% 25.7 15
16 20.6% 20.6 16
17 16.5% 16.5 17
18 12.3% 12.3 18
19 9.7% 9.7 19
20 7.3% 7.3 20
21 4.7% 4.7 21
22 2.1% 2.1 22
23 0.7% 0.7 23
24 0.2% 0.2 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0