Furman
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
84  Aaron Templeton SO 31:45
99  Tanner Hinkle JR 31:51
146  Troy Reeder JR 32:01
151  Frank Lara SO 32:03
291  Josh Brickell SO 32:32
307  Austin Sprague SO 32:34
434  Mark Hadley SO 32:51
594  Lee Shearer JR 33:09
600  Kyle Polman JR 33:09
776  Matt Lange SO 33:27
1,459  Quintin McKinnish FR 34:27
1,873  Jack Miller SR 35:08
2,607  Hayden Cox FR 37:02
National Rank #22 of 308
Southeast Region Rank #5 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 92.0%
Most Likely Finish 19th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.9%
Top 10 at Nationals 10.7%
Top 20 at Nationals 54.3%


Regional Champion 8.8%
Top 5 in Regional 82.0%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Aaron Templeton Tanner Hinkle Troy Reeder Frank Lara Josh Brickell Austin Sprague Mark Hadley Lee Shearer Kyle Polman Matt Lange Quintin McKinnish
Panorama Farms Invitational 09/26 655 32:46 31:53 32:11 31:57 32:11 32:37 32:39 33:01 32:37 34:12
Gene Mullin Invitational 10/10 1038 32:48 32:38 33:05 33:48 33:15 34:19
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/16 577 32:05 31:48 31:49 32:02 32:23 32:33 32:49
Wake Forest Invitational 10/16 1131 33:00 33:01 33:14 34:37
Southern Conference Championship 10/31 864 32:41 32:27 32:25 32:37 32:45 32:36 33:22 33:50 32:55
Southeast Region Championships 11/13 519 31:41 31:37 32:02 31:40 32:46 32:34 33:46
NCAA Championship 11/21 522 31:25 31:43 31:54 32:14 32:48 32:20 33:11





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 92.0% 18.7 473 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.9 1.5 1.7 2.6 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.8 4.7 4.4 4.6 4.4 4.7 5.7 4.9 4.4 4.5 4.7 4.7 4.3 3.7 3.6 2.9 2.8 1.5 0.6
Region Championship 100% 3.9 121 8.8 13.7 18.2 21.3 19.9 13.9 3.3 0.8 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Aaron Templeton 93.0% 77.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.3 0.3
Tanner Hinkle 92.6% 89.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1
Troy Reeder 92.1% 114.3
Frank Lara 92.0% 119.1
Josh Brickell 92.0% 182.6
Austin Sprague 92.0% 187.2
Mark Hadley 92.0% 212.8


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Aaron Templeton 14.5 0.0 0.3 0.7 1.4 2.1 3.4 4.0 4.2 5.3 5.0 5.5 5.5 5.3 5.0 5.0 4.7 4.3 3.5 3.6 3.4 3.0 3.1 2.6 2.3 2.0
Tanner Hinkle 16.7 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.9 1.4 1.9 3.1 3.1 4.3 4.6 5.0 5.6 5.7 4.8 5.4 4.5 4.9 4.0 4.0 3.9 3.2 2.9 2.9 2.3
Troy Reeder 22.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.7 1.7 1.9 2.0 3.1 3.8 4.0 4.7 4.4 4.7 4.8 4.4 4.5 4.1 4.4 4.3 3.9
Frank Lara 22.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.9 2.2 2.9 4.0 4.4 5.2 5.0 4.9 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.3 4.2 4.1
Josh Brickell 38.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 1.0 0.7 1.2 1.9
Austin Sprague 41.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.6
Mark Hadley 56.0 0.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 8.8% 100.0% 8.8 8.8 1
2 13.7% 100.0% 13.7 13.7 2
3 18.2% 99.7% 5.1 5.3 3.2 1.5 1.1 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 18.2 3
4 21.3% 99.7% 4.3 4.0 2.3 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.5 1.5 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.1 21.3 4
5 19.9% 92.0% 2.4 2.6 1.6 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.2 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.2 1.6 18.3 5
6 13.9% 75.5% 0.5 1.3 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.1 1.0 1.3 1.4 1.3 3.4 10.5 6
7 3.3% 37.2% 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 2.1 1.2 7
8 0.8% 2.6% 0.0 0.8 0.0 8
9 0.1% 0.1 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 92.0% 8.8 13.7 5.1 9.6 9.6 7.0 5.4 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.4 3.7 4.2 4.0 3.5 8.0 22.5 69.5




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Mississippi 91.7% 1.0 0.9
Florida State 91.5% 1.0 0.9
Michigan State 90.9% 1.0 0.9
North Carolina St. 87.9% 1.0 0.9
Washington 77.6% 1.0 0.8
Columbia 70.8% 1.0 0.7
Eastern Kentucky 65.9% 1.0 0.7
Tulsa 64.7% 1.0 0.6
UCLA 64.4% 1.0 0.6
Indiana 61.1% 1.0 0.6
Oklahoma 60.8% 1.0 0.6
Boise State 57.0% 1.0 0.6
Illinois 47.5% 1.0 0.5
Princeton 19.2% 1.0 0.2
Providence 14.1% 1.0 0.1
Lamar 9.0% 1.0 0.1
Notre Dame 8.2% 1.0 0.1
Wisconsin 7.0% 1.0 0.1
Penn State 3.3% 1.0 0.0
Portland 2.2% 1.0 0.0
Dartmouth 1.0% 1.0 0.0
Iowa State 0.8% 1.0 0.0
Yale 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Auburn 0.2% 1.0 0.0
New Mexico 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.0% 1.0 0.0
South Dakota St. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 10.0
Minimum 2.0
Maximum 17.0