Oklahoma
Men - Women
2014 - 2015 - 2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
13  Jacob Burcham JR 31:12
43  Brandon Doughty SR 31:29
166  Dylan Blankenbaker JR 32:08
224  Matt Brafford FR 32:21
243  Eric Aldritt JR 32:24
441  Will Hogston SR 32:52
659  Liam Meirow FR 33:16
795  Allen Eke SR 33:29
1,074  Alonzo Chavez JR 33:53
1,101  Zac Randall SR 33:55
1,425  Hunter Heaton SR 34:24
National Rank #16 of 308
Midwest Region Rank #2 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 71.5%
Most Likely Finish 14th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.9%
Top 10 at Nationals 13.3%
Top 20 at Nationals 55.6%


Regional Champion 19.8%
Top 5 in Regional 98.7%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Jacob Burcham Brandon Doughty Dylan Blankenbaker Matt Brafford Eric Aldritt Will Hogston Liam Meirow Allen Eke Alonzo Chavez Zac Randall Hunter Heaton
Panorama Farms Invitational 09/26 496 31:34 31:31 32:06 32:01 32:13 32:55 33:50 32:35
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/16 664 31:26 31:27 32:07 33:05 33:26 35:21
Big 12 Championships 10/31 555 31:07 31:31 32:07 33:03 32:23 32:42 33:17 33:30 33:56 34:25
Midwest Region Championships 11/13 532 31:03 31:17 32:07 32:21 32:44 33:07 33:32
NCAA Championship 11/21 534 30:57 31:41 32:17 32:00 32:36 33:13 33:12





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 71.5% 15.9 429 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.3 1.9 2.5 2.8 4.0 4.0 4.4 4.2 4.9 4.5 4.3 4.4 4.1 3.7 3.7 3.0 2.9 2.1 2.1 1.8 1.2 1.3 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.1
Region Championship 100% 2.5 96 19.8 38.5 22.4 11.8 6.2 1.1 0.2



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jacob Burcham 96.7% 20.2 0.3 1.4 2.6 3.2 3.3 3.6 3.4 3.1 3.3 3.1 2.5 2.8 2.4 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.2 1.7 2.2 1.6 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.6
Brandon Doughty 88.7% 46.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.3 1.4 1.1 1.6 1.5 1.3
Dylan Blankenbaker 71.5% 126.6 0.0
Matt Brafford 71.5% 158.6
Eric Aldritt 71.5% 166.0
Will Hogston 71.5% 211.4
Liam Meirow 71.6% 234.6


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Jacob Burcham 2.3 24.2 21.4 14.9 9.9 6.8 5.6 3.9 3.1 2.3 1.5 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0
Brandon Doughty 5.4 2.7 7.6 11.8 12.1 11.7 9.3 9.1 6.1 4.8 4.3 2.8 2.4 2.2 1.9 1.8 1.5 1.1 1.2 0.7 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.4 0.3
Dylan Blankenbaker 19.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.7 1.7 2.4 2.6 4.0 4.2 4.9 4.0 4.9 5.1 4.7 4.5 4.6 3.7 3.8 3.5 3.0 2.6 3.0
Matt Brafford 26.6 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 1.1 1.3 2.0 2.6 2.9 3.1 3.8 3.6 3.6 4.2 3.7 4.3 3.9 3.3
Eric Aldritt 28.9 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.4 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.6 2.3 2.8 3.2 3.5 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.5 3.5
Will Hogston 52.9 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2
Liam Meirow 77.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 19.8% 100.0% 19.8 19.8 1
2 38.5% 100.0% 38.5 38.5 2
3 22.4% 48.7% 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.2 0.8 1.1 0.7 0.6 1.0 0.7 0.7 0.9 1.0 11.5 10.9 3
4 11.8% 17.5% 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 9.7 2.1 4
5 6.2% 3.2% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.2 5
6 1.1% 1.1 6
7 0.2% 0.2 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 71.5% 19.8 38.5 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.2 1.0 1.3 1.0 0.9 1.2 1.0 0.9 1.2 1.3 28.5 58.3 13.2




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Mississippi 91.7% 1.0 0.9
Furman 88.3% 1.0 0.9
Texas 38.3% 1.0 0.4
Princeton 19.2% 1.0 0.2
Lamar 9.0% 1.0 0.1
Notre Dame 8.2% 1.0 0.1
Penn State 3.3% 1.0 0.0
Dartmouth 1.0% 1.0 0.0
Iowa State 0.8% 2.0 0.0
Yale 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Auburn 0.2% 1.0 0.0
New Mexico 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.0% 1.0 0.0
South Dakota St. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 2.6
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 6.0