Cincinnati
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
700  Emily Clay SO 21:13
1,181  Kaitlyn Meyer SO 21:46
1,400  Anne Pace FR 22:00
1,515  Alison Zukowski SR 22:08
1,526  Ashley Earman SO 22:09
1,740  Alex Mahle FR 22:21
2,340  Amber McAlpine SO 23:02
2,827  Stephanie Mee FR 23:42
3,269  Lauren Goodwin SO 24:41
National Rank #183 of 339
Great Lakes Region Rank #23 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 21st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 47.6%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Emily Clay Kaitlyn Meyer Anne Pace Alison Zukowski Ashley Earman Alex Mahle Amber McAlpine Stephanie Mee Lauren Goodwin
All-Ohio Championships 09/29 1222 21:14 21:46 21:52 21:53 22:04 22:41 23:42
Pre-Nationals Meet (Black) 10/13 1234 21:11 21:54 22:21 22:26 22:22 22:08 23:21 23:28 24:41
Big East Championships 10/26 1240 21:18 21:42 22:17 22:03 22:41 23:04 23:59
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/09 1218 21:11 21:45 21:34 22:10 22:01 22:41





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 20.6 613 0.0 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.5 4.0 7.6 13.1 18.8 18.9 14.3 9.6 5.1 2.5 1.5 0.4 0.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Emily Clay 75.5
Kaitlyn Meyer 117.1
Anne Pace 134.3
Alison Zukowski 144.8
Ashley Earman 145.1
Alex Mahle 158.5
Amber McAlpine 190.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 0.0% 0.0 12
13 0.2% 0.2 13
14 0.5% 0.5 14
15 1.0% 1.0 15
16 2.5% 2.5 16
17 4.0% 4.0 17
18 7.6% 7.6 18
19 13.1% 13.1 19
20 18.8% 18.8 20
21 18.9% 18.9 21
22 14.3% 14.3 22
23 9.6% 9.6 23
24 5.1% 5.1 24
25 2.5% 2.5 25
26 1.5% 1.5 26
27 0.4% 0.4 27
28 0.2% 0.2 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0