Clemson
Men
-
Women
2011
-
2012 -
2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
269 |
Kate Borowicz |
SR |
20:32 |
279 |
Natalie Anthony |
JR |
20:32 |
297 |
Erin Barker |
SR |
20:35 |
753 |
Cara Talty |
JR |
21:17 |
817 |
Alyssa Henshaw |
JR |
21:21 |
976 |
Brianna Blanton |
FR |
21:32 |
1,274 |
Sara Manesiotis |
SO |
21:52 |
1,352 |
Brianna Feerst |
FR |
21:57 |
1,462 |
Lisa Girard |
JR |
22:05 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
14.8% |
Top 10 in Regional |
95.5% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Kate Borowicz |
Natalie Anthony |
Erin Barker |
Cara Talty |
Alyssa Henshaw |
Brianna Blanton |
Sara Manesiotis |
Brianna Feerst |
Lisa Girard |
Charlotte Invitational (Gold) |
09/28 |
981 |
20:21 |
20:39 |
20:59 |
21:18 |
21:15 |
21:25 |
|
|
21:37 |
Charlotte Invitational (Green) |
09/28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21:49 |
|
Pre-Nationals Meet (Red) |
10/13 |
948 |
20:39 |
20:26 |
20:42 |
21:21 |
21:02 |
21:49 |
|
|
22:05 |
Pre-Nationals Meet (Black) |
10/13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21:40 |
22:04 |
|
ACC Championships |
10/27 |
963 |
20:48 |
20:34 |
20:23 |
21:14 |
21:49 |
21:31 |
22:10 |
21:50 |
22:40 |
Southeast Region Championships |
11/09 |
895 |
20:19 |
20:35 |
20:23 |
21:16 |
21:27 |
21:27 |
|
22:04 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.3% |
28.9 |
668 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Region Championship |
100% |
7.3 |
252 |
|
0.0 |
0.7 |
4.1 |
9.9 |
19.9 |
23.1 |
22.3 |
10.4 |
5.0 |
2.4 |
1.2 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Kate Borowicz |
0.4% |
135.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natalie Anthony |
0.4% |
134.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erin Barker |
0.3% |
123.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cara Talty |
0.3% |
222.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alyssa Henshaw |
0.3% |
231.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brianna Blanton |
0.3% |
240.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sara Manesiotis |
0.3% |
250.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Kate Borowicz |
28.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.7 |
0.9 |
1.4 |
2.3 |
2.1 |
2.5 |
3.0 |
3.2 |
3.3 |
3.4 |
3.7 |
4.2 |
3.8 |
Natalie Anthony |
29.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.9 |
1.0 |
1.3 |
1.6 |
1.9 |
2.4 |
2.6 |
2.5 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
Erin Barker |
31.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
1.2 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
2.3 |
1.9 |
2.9 |
2.8 |
3.2 |
3.2 |
2.9 |
Cara Talty |
75.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alyssa Henshaw |
82.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brianna Blanton |
100.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sara Manesiotis |
137.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
0.0% |
100.0% |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
2 |
3 |
0.7% |
22.9% |
| |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
0.2 |
3 |
4 |
4.1% |
1.4% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
4.1 |
|
0.1 |
4 |
5 |
9.9% |
0.2% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
9.9 |
|
0.0 |
5 |
6 |
19.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
23.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
22.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
10.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
5.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
2.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
1.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
0.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.3% |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
99.7 |
0.0 |
0.2 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Illinois |
0.7% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Tulsa |
0.5% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Baylor |
0.5% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Ohio U. |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Air Force |
0.0% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
2.0 |