Creighton
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,547  Courtney Sawle SO 22:10
2,263  Emily Mauser FR 22:56
2,264  Emily Peterson FR 22:56
2,436  Meghan Barry SO 23:09
2,680  Meagan Wilderson JR 23:29
2,905  Jess Johnson SO 23:50
3,043  Anna Weirick FR 24:05
3,421  Lauren Hintz JR 25:10
3,423  Katie Huyck SO 25:11
3,549  Isabelle Squires SR 25:48
3,651  Katy Kambhu FR 26:25
National Rank #258 of 339
Midwest Region Rank #31 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 32nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Courtney Sawle Emily Mauser Emily Peterson Meghan Barry Meagan Wilderson Jess Johnson Anna Weirick Lauren Hintz Katie Huyck Isabelle Squires Katy Kambhu
Charles Bowles Willamette Invitational 09/29 1340 21:53 22:58 22:46 24:18 23:08 23:53 24:06
Bradley Classic 10/12 1330 21:52 22:54 23:02 22:44 23:47 25:10 25:11 25:48 26:25
Missouri Valley Championships 10/27 1325 22:15 22:48 22:46 23:07 23:28
Midwest Region Championships 11/09 1397 23:14 23:11 23:23 23:03 24:06





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 32.5 957 0.0 0.1 0.4 2.4 10.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Courtney Sawle 150.0
Emily Mauser 194.9
Emily Peterson 195.1
Meghan Barry 204.2
Meagan Wilderson 214.6
Jess Johnson 221.2
Anna Weirick 225.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 0.0% 0.0 27
28 0.1% 0.1 28
29 0.4% 0.4 29
30 2.4% 2.4 30
31 10.0% 10.0 31
32 41.2% 41.2 32
33 30.0% 30.0 33
34 14.1% 14.1 34
35 1.7% 1.7 35
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0