George Mason
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
362  Bethany Sachtleben SO 20:43
1,236  Peyton Lowe SO 21:50
1,588  Jennifer Nakamura FR 22:12
1,830  Katie Treichel FR 22:27
2,080  Victoria Samyn JR 22:44
2,242  Catherine Pulley SO 22:55
2,355  Monique McKenzie SR 23:03
2,516  Victoria Doss FR 23:16
2,757  Siobhan Klie FR 23:36
2,791  Lauren Givens SO 23:38
3,404  Maggie Underwood SO 25:07
3,711  Taylor Reffett FR 26:59
National Rank #149 of 339
Southeast Region Rank #19 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 26th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 3.8%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Bethany Sachtleben Peyton Lowe Jennifer Nakamura Katie Treichel Victoria Samyn Catherine Pulley Monique McKenzie Victoria Doss Siobhan Klie Lauren Givens Maggie Underwood
Mason Invitational 09/29 1206 20:46 21:55 22:11 22:27 23:01 22:54 23:38 23:23 23:10 25:16
Delaware's Blue Gold Invitational 10/12 1250 21:25 21:54 22:10 22:06 22:48 23:35 22:53 23:06 23:30 24:01 25:07
Colonial Athletic Association Championships 10/27 1141 20:23 21:32 22:17 22:46 22:39 22:39 23:03 22:48 24:03 23:42 25:00
Southeast Region Championships 11/09 1181 20:38 21:53 22:13 22:29 22:40 23:37 23:40





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 25.7 733 0.1 0.3 1.0 2.4 4.2 6.6 8.7 11.4 12.6 13.2 12.1 10.2 8.0 4.5 2.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Bethany Sachtleben 38.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.0 1.4 1.5 1.5
Peyton Lowe 132.3
Jennifer Nakamura 166.8
Katie Treichel 188.0
Victoria Samyn 210.6
Catherine Pulley 222.4
Monique McKenzie 230.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 0.3% 0.3 18
19 1.0% 1.0 19
20 2.4% 2.4 20
21 4.2% 4.2 21
22 6.6% 6.6 22
23 8.7% 8.7 23
24 11.4% 11.4 24
25 12.6% 12.6 25
26 13.2% 13.2 26
27 12.1% 12.1 27
28 10.2% 10.2 28
29 8.0% 8.0 29
30 4.5% 4.5 30
31 2.4% 2.4 31
32 1.5% 1.5 32
33 0.4% 0.4 33
34 0.2% 0.2 34
35 0.1% 0.1 35
36 0.0% 0.0 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0