IPFW
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,199  Julie Jeszensky JR 21:48
1,667  Kaitlyn Simmons FR 22:18
1,726  Andrea Bell FR 22:20
1,790  Kayla Boyes JR 22:25
1,850  Amaya Ayers JR 22:28
2,113  Anna Reibs FR 22:46
2,519  Jordan Tomecek JR 23:16
2,952  Rebecca Jacobs JR 23:55
3,352  Alexa Brown FR 24:56
National Rank #213 of 339
Great Lakes Region Rank #25 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 27th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.7%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Julie Jeszensky Kaitlyn Simmons Andrea Bell Kayla Boyes Amaya Ayers Anna Reibs Jordan Tomecek Rebecca Jacobs Alexa Brown
Notre Dame Invitational 09/28 1262 21:29 22:44 22:47 22:00 22:21 23:19 22:45 24:29 25:26
Bradley Classic 10/12 1253 21:25 22:19 22:24 22:25 22:38 22:50 23:13 23:40 24:46
The Summit League Championships 10/27 1264 22:28 22:13 22:17 22:19 22:19 22:32 24:20 23:50 24:50
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/09 1261 22:01 22:05 22:02 23:27 22:36 22:36





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 26.0 753 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.5 1.0 2.6 5.2 10.0 15.1 18.5 25.3 20.3 1.2 0.0 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Julie Jeszensky 117.8
Kaitlyn Simmons 154.7
Andrea Bell 157.1
Kayla Boyes 161.8
Amaya Ayers 164.7
Anna Reibs 180.4
Jordan Tomecek 198.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 0.0% 0.0 17
18 0.0% 0.0 18
19 0.2% 0.2 19
20 0.5% 0.5 20
21 1.0% 1.0 21
22 2.6% 2.6 22
23 5.2% 5.2 23
24 10.0% 10.0 24
25 15.1% 15.1 25
26 18.5% 18.5 26
27 25.3% 25.3 27
28 20.3% 20.3 28
29 1.2% 1.2 29
30 0.0% 0.0 30
31 0.0% 0.0 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0