Auburn
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
411  Alissa Fisher JR 20:49
795  Taylor Duncan FR 21:19
986  Erin Fondren SO 21:33
1,353  Elizabeth Briasco JR 21:57
1,644  Sage Blackwell FR 22:16
1,982  Kristin Sheehan FR 22:36
2,052  Danielle Lusk SO 22:42
2,459  Erika Kolakowski JR 23:11
2,533  Samantha Berggren SO 23:17
3,016  Lauren Barr SO 24:02
3,051  Madeline Sharp FR 24:07
3,126  Mary Beth Strickland SO 24:19
National Rank #139 of 339
South Region Rank #17 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 15th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 5.1%
Top 20 in Regional 99.9%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Alissa Fisher Taylor Duncan Erin Fondren Elizabeth Briasco Sage Blackwell Kristin Sheehan Danielle Lusk Erika Kolakowski Samantha Berggren Lauren Barr Madeline Sharp
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 09/29 1199 21:04 21:19 21:34 21:57 22:53 22:33 22:57 23:17
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/13 1147 20:36 21:20 21:27 22:06 22:45 22:37 23:20 22:57 24:02 24:07
SEC Championships 10/26 1196 20:48 21:28 22:06 22:32 22:48 23:46
South Region Championships 11/09 21:46





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 14.1 444 0.0 0.3 0.8 1.2 2.7 5.6 9.5 14.8 20.4 21.0 13.2 7.3 2.0 0.8 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Alissa Fisher 0.4% 184.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Alissa Fisher 37.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.9 2.3 2.2
Taylor Duncan 71.5 0.0 0.0
Erin Fondren 87.0
Elizabeth Briasco 113.3
Sage Blackwell 132.2
Kristin Sheehan 153.7
Danielle Lusk 159.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 0.0% 0.0 6
7 0.3% 0.3 7
8 0.8% 0.8 8
9 1.2% 1.2 9
10 2.7% 2.7 10
11 5.6% 5.6 11
12 9.5% 9.5 12
13 14.8% 14.8 13
14 20.4% 20.4 14
15 21.0% 21.0 15
16 13.2% 13.2 16
17 7.3% 7.3 17
18 2.0% 2.0 18
19 0.8% 0.8 19
20 0.2% 0.2 20
21 0.1% 0.1 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0