Fordham
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
785  Anisa Arsenault JR 21:19
1,305  Suzy Sikorski FR 21:54
1,700  Mara Lieberman SO 22:19
1,753  Danielle Drummond SO 22:22
1,870  Melissa Higgins SO 22:29
2,070  Christina Vivinetto JR 22:43
2,347  Sarah Glockenmeier SO 23:02
2,421  Kerry Sorenson JR 23:08
2,468  Jillian Brooks SO 23:12
2,476  Christina Machado SR 23:13
2,839  Amanda Foggia SR 23:43
2,916  Shannon McKenna SR 23:52
3,001  Rachel Picard FR 24:00
3,044  Titi Fagade JR 24:06
3,064  Ashley Davis SR 24:09
3,100  Danielle Rowe FR 24:14
3,487  MacKenzie Dancho SO 25:26
3,490  Tara Cangialosi FR 25:27
3,562  Kristen Stuart SO 25:52
3,627  Kellen Fitzgerald SR 26:12
3,670  Coral Hershkovitz SO 26:35
3,671  Melanie Notarstefano FR 26:35
3,803  Elise Tigani SO 28:23
National Rank #195 of 339
Northeast Region Rank #24 of 42
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 23rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 5.1%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Anisa Arsenault Suzy Sikorski Mara Lieberman Danielle Drummond Melissa Higgins Christina Vivinetto Sarah Glockenmeier Kerry Sorenson Jillian Brooks Christina Machado Amanda Foggia
Metropolitan Conference Championships 10/05 1172 20:42 21:30 21:53 22:18 22:31 22:44 22:46 22:54 23:41 23:36 24:01
Tribe Open 10/13 1238 21:20 21:58 22:29 22:36 22:04 22:23 23:02
Saint John's Fall Festival 10/14 1361 23:01 22:56 22:59 23:35
Atlantic 10 Championships 10/27 1250 21:17 21:44 23:12 22:17 22:33 22:53 23:21 23:12
Northeast Region Championships 11/09 1268 21:56 22:41 21:59 22:22 22:41 22:50 23:42





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 23.9 735 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.4 3.0 6.1 12.5 20.5 19.4 15.3 9.5 5.4 3.4 1.6 0.8 0.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Anisa Arsenault 91.7
Suzy Sikorski 132.9
Mara Lieberman 164.1
Danielle Drummond 168.8
Melissa Higgins 177.3
Christina Vivinetto 195.1
Sarah Glockenmeier 215.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 0.0% 0.0 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 0.1% 0.1 17
18 0.4% 0.4 18
19 1.4% 1.4 19
20 3.0% 3.0 20
21 6.1% 6.1 21
22 12.5% 12.5 22
23 20.5% 20.5 23
24 19.4% 19.4 24
25 15.3% 15.3 25
26 9.5% 9.5 26
27 5.4% 5.4 27
28 3.4% 3.4 28
29 1.6% 1.6 29
30 0.8% 0.8 30
31 0.4% 0.4 31
32 0.1% 0.1 32
33 0.0% 0.0 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0