Lipscomb
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
373  Dani Walker SO 20:45
571  Tessa Hoefle JR 21:03
852  Maggie Lawrence SO 21:23
874  Madelin Talbert FR 21:24
1,028  Minna Fields SO 21:36
1,124  Kendra Lobley SO 21:42
1,484  Alex Newby JR 22:07
1,489  Hannah Munyan FR 22:07
1,508  Missy Dowd JR 22:08
1,763  Renee Menzie SO 22:23
1,780  Kellie Foley FR 22:24
1,809  Kaitlyn Llewellyn SO 22:26
2,018  Kayla Droessler SO 22:40
2,066  Emily Longden JR 22:43
2,284  Amanda Twigg JR 22:59
2,338  Alex Tate FR 23:02
2,345  Lana Hojeij SO 23:02
2,933  Katie Bunker JR 23:53
3,052  Makenna Rickner FR 24:08
3,074  Anna Belner JR 24:10
National Rank #121 of 339
South Region Rank #12 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 8th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.7%
Top 10 in Regional 73.1%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Dani Walker Tessa Hoefle Maggie Lawrence Madelin Talbert Minna Fields Kendra Lobley Alex Newby Hannah Munyan Missy Dowd Renee Menzie Kellie Foley
Greater Louisville Classic (Blue) 09/29 1272 22:08 22:01
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 09/29 1199 22:15 21:22 21:44 21:21 21:43 21:48 22:07 22:13
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/13 1122 20:56 20:58 21:02 21:32 21:40 21:48 22:07 22:06 22:41 22:25
Atlantic Sun Championships 10/27 1105 20:44 21:00 21:25 21:24 21:26 21:19 21:57 22:24
South Region Championships 11/09 1050 20:20 20:59 21:21 21:21 21:32 21:45 22:18





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 9.1 330 0.1 0.7 11.6 15.4 16.9 14.9 13.5 10.8 7.4 5.0 2.3 1.1 0.2 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Dani Walker 0.6% 171.3


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Dani Walker 34.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.2 2.3 2.6 3.2
Tessa Hoefle 53.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3
Maggie Lawrence 76.4 0.0
Madelin Talbert 77.2 0.0 0.0
Minna Fields 90.4
Kendra Lobley 97.9
Alex Newby 122.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 0.1% 0.1 4
5 0.7% 0.7 5
6 11.6% 11.6 6
7 15.4% 15.4 7
8 16.9% 16.9 8
9 14.9% 14.9 9
10 13.5% 13.5 10
11 10.8% 10.8 11
12 7.4% 7.4 12
13 5.0% 5.0 13
14 2.3% 2.3 14
15 1.1% 1.1 15
16 0.2% 0.2 16
17 0.0% 0.0 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0