Miss State
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
387  Renee Masterson SR 20:47
489  Chloe Phillips JR 20:57
676  Katie Huston JR 21:11
803  Jodie McGuff SO 21:20
1,169  Fabienne Amrhein FR 21:46
1,320  Carmen Brothers SO 21:55
1,321  Emma Neigel SO 21:55
1,370  Cornelia Griesche FR 21:58
1,527  Adrianna Poole SR 22:09
2,004  Evie Savage SO 22:39
2,442  Katelyn Walker FR 23:10
2,497  Madison Milhoan FR 23:14
National Rank #112 of 339
South Region Rank #11 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.8%
Top 10 in Regional 79.6%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Renee Masterson Chloe Phillips Katie Huston Jodie McGuff Fabienne Amrhein Carmen Brothers Emma Neigel Cornelia Griesche Adrianna Poole Evie Savage Katelyn Walker
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 09/28 1035 20:28 20:57 20:56 21:17 21:50 21:16 22:05
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/13 1128 20:55 20:58 21:16 21:18 21:42 22:52 22:04 22:20 22:35 23:09
SEC Championships 10/26 1109 20:50 21:03 21:01 21:17 21:40 22:09 21:50 22:11 22:01 22:43
South Region Championships 11/09 1120 20:49 20:49 21:43 21:32 21:54 21:40 22:01





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 8.7 319 0.0 0.7 16.5 20.3 15.9 14.6 11.6 8.7 5.7 3.2 1.9 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Renee Masterson 0.6% 178.0
Chloe Phillips 0.0% 204.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Renee Masterson 35.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.8 0.7 0.8 1.3 1.6 1.7 1.5 2.1 2.0 2.9
Chloe Phillips 46.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.7 1.0
Katie Huston 62.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Jodie McGuff 72.4 0.0
Fabienne Amrhein 101.8
Carmen Brothers 111.4
Emma Neigel 111.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 0.0% 0.0 4
5 0.7% 0.7 5
6 16.5% 16.5 6
7 20.3% 20.3 7
8 15.9% 15.9 8
9 14.6% 14.6 9
10 11.6% 11.6 10
11 8.7% 8.7 11
12 5.7% 5.7 12
13 3.2% 3.2 13
14 1.9% 1.9 14
15 0.7% 0.7 15
16 0.2% 0.2 16
17 0.0% 0.0 17
18 0.0% 0.0 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Alabama 0.0% 2.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0