Niagara
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,378  Kim Vona JR 21:59
2,187  Nicole Mehlman SR 22:51
2,453  Alyssa Tusang SR 23:11
2,507  Stephanie Schmidt JR 23:15
3,046  Tyler Levengood FR 24:06
3,142  Lindsey Phillips SR 24:21
3,202  Natalie Regan FR 24:28
3,436  Chelsea Caballero FR 25:14
3,591  Alyssa Tusang 26:01
3,657  Kaylie Lamica JR 26:27
3,732  Sarah Doucette JR 27:10
National Rank #267 of 339
Northeast Region Rank #35 of 42
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 35th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Kim Vona Nicole Mehlman Alyssa Tusang Stephanie Schmidt Tyler Levengood Lindsey Phillips Natalie Regan Chelsea Caballero Alyssa Tusang Kaylie Lamica Sarah Doucette
Lehigh's Paul Short Run (Brown) 09/28 1397 21:58 22:45 26:21 23:07 24:10 24:33 24:37 25:43 26:21 27:27 27:41
Slippery Rock Invitational 10/06 1395 22:20 22:52 23:12 24:04 24:19 24:28 25:17 26:25 26:30
MAAC Championships 10/27 1400 21:50 22:56 25:46 23:28 24:06 24:17 24:23 24:46 25:46 25:45 27:07





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 35.5 1063 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kim Vona 138.0
Nicole Mehlman 203.8
Alyssa Tusang 223.7
Stephanie Schmidt 227.9
Tyler Levengood 270.0
Lindsey Phillips 277.2
Natalie Regan 280.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 0.0% 0.0 28
29 0.1% 0.1 29
30 0.1% 0.1 30
31 0.4% 0.4 31
32 2.7% 2.7 32
33 8.7% 8.7 33
34 18.6% 18.6 34
35 21.8% 21.8 35
36 19.3% 19.3 36
37 14.0% 14.0 37
38 8.7% 8.7 38
39 3.2% 3.2 39
40 1.6% 1.6 40
41 0.5% 0.5 41
42 0.1% 0.1 42
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0