Southern
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
3,196  Angelica Caraballo SO 24:28
3,467  Amber Crews SR 25:20
3,818  Shanelle Zenon SO 28:52
3,835  Shannon Jones-Butts SO 29:38
3,862  Jade Meyers JR 31:09
National Rank #337 of 339
South Central Region Rank #34 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 34th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Angelica Caraballo Amber Crews Shanelle Zenon Shannon Jones-Butts Jade Meyers
MC/Watson Ford Invitational 10/05 2103 24:24 25:46 28:44 32:37 32:19
Choctaw Open 10/13 24:13 25:07 29:46 29:12
SWAC Championships 10/29 2061 24:52 25:26 28:25 29:36 30:50





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 34.0 1041



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Angelica Caraballo 177.8
Amber Crews 195.0
Shanelle Zenon 221.3
Shannon Jones-Butts 224.8
Jade Meyers 226.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 100.0% 100.0 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0