DePaul
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,399  Taylor Hynes JR 21:58
2,008  Jacqueline Kasal JR 22:36
2,193  Courtney Tedeschi FR 22:48
2,201  Jessica Sanborn FR 22:48
2,242  Hannah Pulliam SR 22:51
2,610  Paige Skorseth FR 23:15
2,854  Elizabeth Wasserman FR 23:37
3,023  Lauren Sharp FR 23:54
National Rank #245 of 340
Midwest Region Rank #30 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 32nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Taylor Hynes Jacqueline Kasal Courtney Tedeschi Jessica Sanborn Hannah Pulliam Paige Skorseth Elizabeth Wasserman Lauren Sharp
UW Parkside Lucian Rosa Invitational 10/12 1302 22:01 21:58 23:04 22:59 22:59 23:53
Bradley Classic 10/18 1291 21:42 22:27 22:47 22:58 22:55 23:47
Big East Championships 11/02 1301 22:10 22:57 22:45 22:50 22:48 23:24 23:51 24:06
Midwest Region Championships 11/15 1300 21:56 23:06 22:52 22:39 22:48 24:13 23:24





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 31.3 927 0.1 0.5 4.6 19.3 28.6



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Taylor Hynes 140.9
Jacqueline Kasal 188.6
Courtney Tedeschi 199.4
Jessica Sanborn 200.0
Hannah Pulliam 202.3
Paige Skorseth 216.9
Elizabeth Wasserman 225.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 0.1% 0.1 27
28 0.5% 0.5 28
29 4.6% 4.6 29
30 19.3% 19.3 30
31 28.6% 28.6 31
32 33.6% 33.6 32
33 12.8% 12.8 33
34 0.4% 0.4 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0