Eastern Washington
Men
-
Women
2012
-
2013 -
2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
755 |
Berenice Penaloza |
SO |
21:17 |
847 |
Sarah Reiter |
FR |
21:23 |
1,191 |
Katie Mahoney |
SO |
21:45 |
1,278 |
Paula Gil Echevarria |
FR |
21:50 |
1,534 |
Caite Arrigoni |
JR |
22:06 |
2,030 |
Mayra Chavez |
SO |
22:38 |
2,292 |
Keeley Davidson |
FR |
22:55 |
3,021 |
Katie Lynch |
FR |
23:54 |
|
National Rank |
#179 of 340 |
West Region Rank |
#26 of 39 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
0.0% |
Most Likely Finish |
23rd at Regional |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
10.5% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Berenice Penaloza |
Sarah Reiter |
Katie Mahoney |
Paula Gil Echevarria |
Caite Arrigoni |
Mayra Chavez |
Keeley Davidson |
Katie Lynch |
Notre Dame Invitational (Gold) |
10/04 |
1224 |
21:31 |
21:25 |
21:39 |
22:11 |
22:03 |
|
|
|
Big Sky Championships |
11/01 |
1216 |
21:22 |
21:47 |
21:44 |
21:25 |
21:59 |
22:38 |
23:29 |
23:22 |
West Region Championships |
11/15 |
1160 |
20:52 |
20:57 |
21:56 |
21:56 |
22:20 |
|
22:27 |
24:38 |
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
23.6 |
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
2.1 |
7.4 |
12.9 |
13.8 |
14.1 |
13.6 |
11.1 |
8.9 |
6.6 |
4.1 |
2.9 |
1.2 |
0.2 |
NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Berenice Penaloza |
107.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sarah Reiter |
116.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Katie Mahoney |
147.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paula Gil Echevarria |
154.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caite Arrigoni |
174.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mayra Chavez |
209.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keeley Davidson |
224.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
10 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
12 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
13 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
16 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
2.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
7.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
12.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
13.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
22 |
23 |
14.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
23 |
24 |
13.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
24 |
25 |
11.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
25 |
26 |
8.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
26 |
27 |
6.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
27 |
28 |
4.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
28 |
29 |
2.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
29 |
30 |
1.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
30 |
31 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
31 |
32 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |