Kansas State
Men
-
Women
2012
-
2013 -
2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
125 |
Laura Galvan |
JR |
20:09 |
130 |
Martina Tresch |
SR |
20:10 |
546 |
Mary Frances Donnelly |
SO |
21:02 |
909 |
Morgan Wedekind |
FR |
21:27 |
1,022 |
Erika Schiller |
JR |
21:35 |
1,858 |
Heather Ruder |
FR |
22:26 |
2,252 |
Madison Hopfinger |
FR |
22:52 |
2,291 |
Paige Kochuyt |
SO |
22:55 |
2,380 |
Marie Taylor |
FR |
23:01 |
2,515 |
Audrey Schmitz |
FR |
23:07 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
12.6% |
Top 10 in Regional |
63.6% |
Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Laura Galvan |
Martina Tresch |
Mary Frances Donnelly |
Morgan Wedekind |
Erika Schiller |
Heather Ruder |
Madison Hopfinger |
Paige Kochuyt |
Marie Taylor |
Audrey Schmitz |
Rim Rock Farm Classic |
10/05 |
905 |
20:15 |
20:02 |
21:06 |
21:49 |
21:32 |
22:14 |
22:52 |
22:41 |
23:01 |
23:07 |
Pre-National Invitational (Blue) |
10/19 |
867 |
20:01 |
20:08 |
20:58 |
21:24 |
21:44 |
22:23 |
|
22:54 |
|
|
Big 12 Championships |
11/02 |
839 |
20:01 |
20:04 |
21:07 |
21:05 |
21:14 |
22:15 |
|
23:42 |
|
|
Midwest Region Championships |
11/15 |
991 |
20:19 |
20:38 |
20:55 |
21:33 |
21:56 |
23:27 |
|
22:47 |
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
25.0 |
630 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
9.2 |
292 |
|
|
1.9 |
4.6 |
6.1 |
8.1 |
9.4 |
10.9 |
10.9 |
11.7 |
11.3 |
9.3 |
7.7 |
5.4 |
1.9 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Laura Galvan |
20.6% |
93.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Martina Tresch |
15.9% |
90.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
Mary Frances Donnelly |
0.0% |
168.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Morgan Wedekind |
0.0% |
240.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erika Schiller |
0.0% |
242.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heather Ruder |
0.0% |
251.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Madison Hopfinger |
0.0% |
252.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Laura Galvan |
11.3 |
0.1 |
0.9 |
2.1 |
3.6 |
5.1 |
5.3 |
5.9 |
5.6 |
6.8 |
6.5 |
6.3 |
5.7 |
6.0 |
5.2 |
4.6 |
4.3 |
3.8 |
3.6 |
3.0 |
2.4 |
2.0 |
2.3 |
1.7 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
Martina Tresch |
12.0 |
0.1 |
0.7 |
1.7 |
2.8 |
3.7 |
4.8 |
5.1 |
5.9 |
6.4 |
6.2 |
6.5 |
6.3 |
6.0 |
5.3 |
4.2 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
4.2 |
3.6 |
3.2 |
2.7 |
2.1 |
1.3 |
1.6 |
1.4 |
Mary Frances Donnelly |
57.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
Morgan Wedekind |
97.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erika Schiller |
108.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heather Ruder |
177.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Madison Hopfinger |
203.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
1.9% |
1.0% |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
1.9 |
|
0.0 |
3 |
4 |
4.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
4 |
5 |
6.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
5 |
6 |
8.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
6 |
7 |
9.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
7 |
8 |
10.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
10.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
11.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
11.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
9.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
7.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
5.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
1.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
0.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
Baylor |
3.8% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Tulsa |
0.1% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Eastern Kentucky |
0.1% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
Kansas |
0.0% |
2.0 |
0.0 |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
2.0 |