Iowa
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
811  Courtney Martin SO 21:20
866  Samantha Zishka FR 21:24
945  Shannon Maser JR 21:30
1,004  Katie Adams FR 21:34
1,395  Tess Wilberding FR 21:58
1,418  Rachel Price SO 21:59
1,475  Jocelyn Todd JR 22:03
1,495  Lena Placzek JR 22:03
2,683  Alana Jones FR 23:21
National Rank #163 of 340
Midwest Region Rank #24 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.3%
Top 20 in Regional 79.4%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Courtney Martin Samantha Zishka Shannon Maser Katie Adams Tess Wilberding Rachel Price Jocelyn Todd Lena Placzek Alana Jones
Roy Griak Invitational 09/28 1207 21:12 21:24 21:33 21:56 22:15 22:09 22:03 23:23
Pre-National Invitational (White) 10/19 1206 21:26 21:25 21:21 21:39 22:05
Big Ten Championships 11/03 1229 21:32 21:54 21:42 21:48 21:46 22:02 23:18
Midwest Region Championships 11/15 1199 21:15 21:13 21:23 22:15 21:58





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 18.4 516 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.2 2.5 7.3 10.8 14.6 14.8 14.2 12.7 7.8 6.2 3.3 1.6 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Courtney Martin 86.7
Samantha Zishka 92.8
Shannon Maser 99.8
Katie Adams 106.5
Tess Wilberding 141.0
Rachel Price 142.5
Jocelyn Todd 146.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 0.0% 0.0 4
5 5
6 0.0% 0.0 6
7 0.0% 0.0 7
8 0.1% 0.1 8
9 0.1% 0.1 9
10 0.1% 0.1 10
11 0.3% 0.3 11
12 0.7% 0.7 12
13 1.2% 1.2 13
14 2.5% 2.5 14
15 7.3% 7.3 15
16 10.8% 10.8 16
17 14.6% 14.6 17
18 14.8% 14.8 18
19 14.2% 14.2 19
20 12.7% 12.7 20
21 7.8% 7.8 21
22 6.2% 6.2 22
23 3.3% 3.3 23
24 1.6% 1.6 24
25 0.9% 0.9 25
26 0.5% 0.5 26
27 0.2% 0.2 27
28 0.1% 0.1 28
29 0.0% 0.0 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0