USC
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
884  Erica Capellino JR 21:26
892  Jenna Tong SO 21:26
1,880  Kira Soderstrom JR 22:27
2,713  Nicole Davies SO 23:24
2,876  Erin Matranga JR 23:38
3,054  Lindsay Enright SR 23:58
3,212  Austin Lundin JR 24:21
3,448  Makenzie Jordan FR 25:05
3,550  Alyssa Reardon SO 25:36
3,574  Natasha Strickland SO 25:42
3,666  Erin Robinson JR 26:17
3,679  Jackie Dion SR 26:24
National Rank #246 of 340
West Region Rank #33 of 39
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 32nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Erica Capellino Jenna Tong Kira Soderstrom Nicole Davies Erin Matranga Lindsay Enright Austin Lundin Makenzie Jordan Alyssa Reardon Natasha Strickland Erin Robinson
Sacremento State Inter-Regional Jamboree 10/04 1336 22:12 21:25 22:54 23:35 24:02 24:14
UCLA Double Dual 10/11 1421 21:19 21:22 24:24 24:53 25:56 25:37 25:40 26:47
UC Riverside Highlander Invite 10/19 1300 21:27 21:18 22:32 23:52 23:44 23:34 24:07 24:44 25:36 25:44 26:05
Pac-12 Championships 11/02 1292 20:57 21:36 22:21 23:36 24:04 24:36
West Region Championships 11/15 21:35





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 31.5 927 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.7 2.7 9.0 33.7



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Erica Capellino 120.9
Jenna Tong 121.1
Kira Soderstrom 198.7
Nicole Davies 240.2
Erin Matranga 246.3
Lindsay Enright 253.6
Austin Lundin 260.1




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 0.1% 0.1 25
26 0.2% 0.2 26
27 0.2% 0.2 27
28 0.7% 0.7 28
29 2.7% 2.7 29
30 9.0% 9.0 30
31 33.7% 33.7 31
32 41.5% 41.5 32
33 11.0% 11.0 33
34 0.8% 0.8 34
35 0.0% 0.0 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0