Mississippi
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
830  Shelby Brown FR 21:21
873  Leanne Zimmer SO 21:25
908  Margaret Harkness JR 21:27
1,064  Elisabeth Gaillet SO 21:37
1,100  Saga Barzowski SO 21:39
1,251  Madison Rawson FR 21:49
1,349  Scarlett Fox SO 21:55
1,597  Emily Bean FR 22:09
1,804  Kat MacNeal FR 22:22
National Rank #173 of 341
South Region Rank #17 of 46
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 12th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 6.4%
Top 20 in Regional 98.8%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Shelby Brown Leanne Zimmer Margaret Harkness Elisabeth Gaillet Saga Barzowski Madison Rawson Scarlett Fox Emily Bean Kat MacNeal
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/04 1200 21:17 21:23 21:46 21:25 21:42 21:47 22:19 22:03 22:10
ISU Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/18 1212 21:22 21:27 21:42 21:51 21:40 21:51 21:46
SEC Championship 10/31 1173 21:13 21:19 21:12 21:35 21:32 21:29 22:15 22:35
South Region Championships 11/14 1198 21:35 21:29 21:08 21:39 21:42 22:15 21:44





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 13.2 426 0.2 0.3 0.5 1.2 4.3 11.0 29.7 17.9 11.7 8.3 5.1 3.9 2.4 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Shelby Brown 73.8 0.0 0.0 0.0
Leanne Zimmer 78.6 0.0
Margaret Harkness 81.6 0.0
Elisabeth Gaillet 97.1 0.0
Saga Barzowski 99.0
Madison Rawson 113.0
Scarlett Fox 119.2




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 0.2% 0.2 6
7 0.3% 0.3 7
8 0.5% 0.5 8
9 1.2% 1.2 9
10 4.3% 4.3 10
11 11.0% 11.0 11
12 29.7% 29.7 12
13 17.9% 17.9 13
14 11.7% 11.7 14
15 8.3% 8.3 15
16 5.1% 5.1 16
17 3.9% 3.9 17
18 2.4% 2.4 18
19 1.4% 1.4 19
20 1.0% 1.0 20
21 0.7% 0.7 21
22 0.3% 0.3 22
23 0.1% 0.1 23
24 0.1% 0.1 24
25 0.0% 0.0 25
26 0.0% 0.0 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0