Samford
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
924  Karisa Nelson FR 21:28
1,163  Rachel Wooten JR 21:44
1,435  Ansley Bos SO 22:00
1,459  Megan Roach FR 22:02
1,839  Emma Garner FR 22:24
1,972  Anna Irvine JR 22:32
2,006  Frances Bernard SR 22:34
2,220  Katelyn Brock SO 22:48
3,724  Chelsea Treadway SR 27:35
National Rank #205 of 341
South Region Rank #24 of 46
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 22nd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 39.9%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Karisa Nelson Rachel Wooten Ansley Bos Megan Roach Emma Garner Anna Irvine Frances Bernard Katelyn Brock Chelsea Treadway
Charlotte Invitational 09/26 1221 21:12 21:46 21:58 22:21 22:25 21:36 22:41
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/17 1252 21:25 21:48 21:53 22:46 22:43 22:55 27:35
Southern Conference Championship 10/31 1242 21:32 21:40 22:05 22:10 22:17 22:32 22:50 22:45
South Region Championships 11/14 1252 21:37 21:41 21:56 22:22 22:45 22:53





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 21.2 593 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.9 1.6 2.9 3.9 5.3 6.4 8.1 10.3 11.3 11.9 11.2 8.5 7.6 5.1 2.9 1.4 0.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Karisa Nelson 83.8 0.0 0.0
Rachel Wooten 106.2
Ansley Bos 126.4
Megan Roach 128.0
Emma Garner 153.5
Anna Irvine 162.6
Frances Bernard 164.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 0.0% 0.0 10
11 0.1% 0.1 11
12 0.3% 0.3 12
13 0.9% 0.9 13
14 1.6% 1.6 14
15 2.9% 2.9 15
16 3.9% 3.9 16
17 5.3% 5.3 17
18 6.4% 6.4 18
19 8.1% 8.1 19
20 10.3% 10.3 20
21 11.3% 11.3 21
22 11.9% 11.9 22
23 11.2% 11.2 23
24 8.5% 8.5 24
25 7.6% 7.6 25
26 5.1% 5.1 26
27 2.9% 2.9 27
28 1.4% 1.4 28
29 0.2% 0.2 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0