Rutgers
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
885  Chris Banafato JR 33:35
1,255  Chris DeFabio SO 34:08
1,780  Anthony Horten SO 34:56
1,962  Jaimin Vekaria FR 35:12
2,266  Curtis Richburg JR 35:39
2,409  Daniel Lee FR 35:58
2,421  Steve Burkholder JR 35:59
2,574  Casey Weiss SR 36:20
2,886  Thomas Bragen JR 37:33
3,022  Brian Wells SO 38:20
National Rank #213 of 311
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #20 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 20th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 68.3%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Chris Banafato Chris DeFabio Anthony Horten Jaimin Vekaria Curtis Richburg Daniel Lee Steve Burkholder Casey Weiss Thomas Bragen Brian Wells
Metropolitan Conference Championships 10/05 1245 33:37 33:44 34:56 35:58 38:00 34:50 36:29 38:02 40:02
Princeton Invitational 10/13 1249 33:36 34:20 35:27 35:27 34:36 35:56 36:01 37:02
Big East Championships 10/26 1223 33:37 34:14 34:23 34:56 36:13 34:51 37:02 36:16 37:15





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 19.6 582 0.5 3.2 9.1 16.3 18.9 20.3 17.3 11.0 3.4



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Chris Banafato 68.9
Chris DeFabio 96.6
Anthony Horten 126.0
Jaimin Vekaria 135.0
Curtis Richburg 149.4
Daniel Lee 159.6
Steve Burkholder 160.3




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 0.5% 0.5 15
16 3.2% 3.2 16
17 9.1% 9.1 17
18 16.3% 16.3 18
19 18.9% 18.9 19
20 20.3% 20.3 20
21 17.3% 17.3 21
22 11.0% 11.0 22
23 3.4% 3.4 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0