Rutgers
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
907  Ashley Deckert JR 21:27
1,027  Allison Payenski SO 21:36
1,161  Brianna Deming JR 21:45
1,474  Jennifer Spitzer SR 22:06
1,495  Rashmi Singh JR 22:07
1,805  Paige Senatore FR 22:26
1,866  Felicia O'Donnell SO 22:29
2,098  Lindsay Bertulis SR 22:46
2,274  Victoria Pontecorvo SR 22:57
3,275  Anjelica Brinkofski SR 24:42
3,411  Stephanie Krausser SR 25:08
National Rank #184 of 339
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #14 of 38
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 14th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 4.3%
Top 20 in Regional 99.8%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Ashley Deckert Allison Payenski Brianna Deming Jennifer Spitzer Rashmi Singh Paige Senatore Felicia O'Donnell Lindsay Bertulis Victoria Pontecorvo Anjelica Brinkofski Stephanie Krausser
Metropolitan Conference Championships 10/05 1221 21:27 21:36 21:33 21:42 22:07 23:06 22:39
Princeton Invitational (I) 10/13 1288 22:10 22:31 22:37 22:47 22:57 24:42 25:08
Big East Championships 10/26 1248 21:50 21:42 22:23 22:13 22:26 21:54 22:38
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/09 1239 21:21 22:04 22:09 21:58 22:17 22:21 23:03





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 13.8 442 0.1 0.9 3.3 8.7 12.0 19.4 22.0 14.9 9.6 4.8 2.3 1.2 0.6 0.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Ashley Deckert 64.4
Allison Payenski 73.0 0.0
Brianna Deming 82.5
Jennifer Spitzer 108.5
Rashmi Singh 111.1
Paige Senatore 135.2
Felicia O'Donnell 139.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 0.1% 0.1 8
9 0.9% 0.9 9
10 3.3% 3.3 10
11 8.7% 8.7 11
12 12.0% 12.0 12
13 19.4% 19.4 13
14 22.0% 22.0 14
15 14.9% 14.9 15
16 9.6% 9.6 16
17 4.8% 4.8 17
18 2.3% 2.3 18
19 1.2% 1.2 19
20 0.6% 0.6 20
21 0.2% 0.2 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0