Marshall
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,027  Caleb Bowen SR 33:42
1,551  Jack Whitney SR 34:23
1,677  William Shaffer SO 34:33
2,161  Jordan Brown-Stobbe JR 35:17
2,232  Brian Salmons JR 35:25
2,400  Austin Hamrick FR 35:46
2,914  Drake Seccurro SO 37:16
3,046  Andrew Looney FR 38:01
3,096  Caleb Haneline FR 38:29
National Rank #216 of 311
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #20 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 20th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 59.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Caleb Bowen Jack Whitney William Shaffer Jordan Brown-Stobbe Brian Salmons Austin Hamrick Drake Seccurro Andrew Looney Caleb Haneline
Cross Country Only National Invitational 10/17 1238 33:28 34:09 34:29 34:53 35:53 36:01 37:10 37:59 38:27
Conference USA Championship 11/01 1255 33:47 34:45 34:27 35:47 35:21 35:26 37:31
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/14 1258 33:49 34:19 34:39 35:08 35:52 37:10





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 20.2 605 0.1 0.2 1.7 6.5 18.8 31.8 26.2 13.4 1.3 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Caleb Bowen 76.3
Jack Whitney 109.0
William Shaffer 116.4
Jordan Brown-Stobbe 145.6
Brian Salmons 150.4
Austin Hamrick 160.7
Drake Seccurro 188.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 0.2% 0.2 16
17 1.7% 1.7 17
18 6.5% 6.5 18
19 18.8% 18.8 19
20 31.8% 31.8 20
21 26.2% 26.2 21
22 13.4% 13.4 22
23 1.3% 1.3 23
24 0.1% 0.1 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0