Missouri
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
203  TJ Carey SO 32:10
246  Tyler Schneider JR 32:19
326  Dan Roe SO 32:31
596  Sam Dickerson SR 33:01
616  Jordan Cook SO 33:03
664  Drew White SO 33:07
861  Chandler Dye SO 33:27
932  Sheldon Keence FR 33:32
1,085  Kenneth Cushing SR 33:46
1,145  Billy Leighton FR 33:52
1,183  Chris Mooneyham FR 33:55
1,234  Tyler Rusboldt SO 33:59
1,238  Evan Schulte FR 33:59
1,289  Marc Dubrick FR 34:02
1,377  Alex Pierce FR 34:08
1,417  Shannon Hall SO 34:11
1,665  Ian McGinn SO 34:32
1,743  Ben Goodman FR 34:38
2,006  Brian Hernan FR 35:01
2,405  Tim Johnson SO 35:46
National Rank #59 of 311
Midwest Region Rank #7 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.8%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 8.1%
Top 10 in Regional 90.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating TJ Carey Tyler Schneider Dan Roe Sam Dickerson Jordan Cook Drew White Chandler Dye Sheldon Keence Kenneth Cushing Billy Leighton Chris Mooneyham
Roy Griak Invitational 09/27 852 31:24 33:33 32:30 33:30 32:45 33:17 33:19 33:19 35:53
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/04 799 32:15 31:49 32:21 33:11 32:49 33:17 33:42
Bradley Pink Classic (Red) 10/17 1121 33:04 33:51 33:10
Bradley Pink Classic (White) 10/17 1329
ISU Pre-National Invitational (Blue Race) 10/18 725 31:37 31:36 32:48 32:44 33:43 33:07 33:34
SEC Championships 10/31 836 32:34 31:54 32:27 32:47 32:52 33:13 34:12 33:31 33:46
Midwest Region Championships 11/14 1070 33:13 34:21 33:06 33:11 32:39 35:27





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.8% 27.1 650 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Region Championship 100% 7.9 244 0.3 0.9 2.0 5.0 11.1 24.7 22.1 15.0 9.0 5.5 2.7 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TJ Carey 6.0% 114.2
Tyler Schneider 1.9% 135.0
Dan Roe 0.8% 148.5
Sam Dickerson 0.8% 211.0
Jordan Cook 0.8% 204.0
Drew White 0.8% 221.0
Chandler Dye 0.8% 239.5


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
TJ Carey 21.4 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.9 2.5 2.7 2.7 3.9 3.6 3.8 3.9 3.8 4.1 3.8 3.3 2.9 3.0 3.0 2.4 2.5 2.5
Tyler Schneider 27.9 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.7 1.8 1.8 2.0 2.7 2.6 2.7 3.0 3.0 3.6 3.3 3.2 2.8 2.8 2.5
Dan Roe 40.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.7 0.6 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.9
Sam Dickerson 74.3 0.0 0.0
Jordan Cook 75.4 0.0
Drew White 80.2 0.0
Chandler Dye 102.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.3% 100.0% 0.3 0.3 2
3 0.9% 44.2% 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.4 3
4 2.0% 7.9% 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.9 0.2 4
5 5.0% 5.0 5
6 11.1% 11.1 6
7 24.7% 24.7 7
8 22.1% 22.1 8
9 15.0% 15.0 9
10 9.0% 9.0 10
11 5.5% 5.5 11
12 2.7% 2.7 12
13 1.1% 1.1 13
14 0.5% 0.5 14
15 0.2% 0.2 15
16 0.1% 0.1 16
17 0.0% 0.0 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 0.8% 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 99.2 0.3 0.5




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Mid. Tenn. State 1.3% 1.0 0.0
Virginia Tech 1.2% 1.0 0.0
North Texas 0.8% 1.0 0.0
Texas-Arlington 0.4% 2.0 0.0
Iowa 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Texas A&M 0.2% 2.0 0.0
Yale 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Bradley 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0