New Mexico St.
Men -
Women
2013
-
2014 -
2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
| Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
|---|
| 445 |
Daniel Rubio |
SR |
32:46 |
| 818 |
Jereme Santistevan |
FR |
33:22 |
| 1,708 |
Tyler Forde |
FR |
34:35 |
| 1,739 |
Nathan Starr |
SR |
34:38 |
| 1,927 |
Evan Bekes |
SR |
34:54 |
| 2,259 |
Herbert Beyale |
JR |
35:28 |
| 2,711 |
Troy Lawton |
FR |
36:32 |
| 2,768 |
Jason Saiz |
JR |
36:42 |
| 3,097 |
Brett Fenton |
FR |
38:29 |
|
| National Champion |
0.0% |
| Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
| Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
| Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
| Regional Champion |
0.0% |
| Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
| Top 10 in Regional |
0.0% |
| Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
| Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Daniel Rubio |
Jereme Santistevan |
Tyler Forde |
Nathan Starr |
Evan Bekes |
Herbert Beyale |
Troy Lawton |
Jason Saiz |
Brett Fenton |
|---|
| Rim Rock Farm Classic |
10/04 |
1133 |
32:30 |
33:33 |
34:30 |
33:55 |
34:43 |
35:04 |
37:30 |
36:13 |
|
| Bronco Invitational |
10/18 |
1185 |
32:59 |
33:39 |
34:03 |
34:54 |
35:05 |
35:44 |
36:09 |
38:20 |
|
| WAC Championships |
11/01 |
1162 |
32:41 |
33:20 |
34:42 |
34:45 |
34:55 |
35:05 |
36:14 |
36:22 |
38:29 |
| Mountain Region Championships |
11/14 |
1172 |
33:00 |
32:43 |
34:59 |
|
34:49 |
35:59 |
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
| NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Region Championship |
100% |
14.7 |
430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
0.6 |
28.8 |
66.7 |
3.5 |
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results
| Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| Daniel Rubio |
50.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
| Jereme Santistevan |
69.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Tyler Forde |
99.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nathan Starr |
100.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Evan Bekes |
105.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Herbert Beyale |
111.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Troy Lawton |
118.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
| Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
| 1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
| 1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
| 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
| 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
| 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
| 7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
| 8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
| 9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
| 10 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
| 11 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
| 12 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
12 |
| 13 |
0.6% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
13 |
| 14 |
28.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
14 |
| 15 |
66.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66.7 |
|
|
15 |
| 16 |
3.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
16 |
| 17 |
0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
17 |
| 18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
| Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
| Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
| Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
| Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
| Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |
