Oklahoma
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
42  Abbabiya Simbassa SR 31:28
81  Brandon Doughty JR 31:45
274  Jacob Burcham SO 32:24
299  Eric Graf SO 32:27
369  Eric Aldritt SO 32:38
466  Alex Deir SR 32:48
678  Zac Randall JR 33:08
695  Will Hogston JR 33:10
729  Kyle Polman SO 33:14
1,525  Allen Eke SO 34:21
National Rank #30 of 311
Midwest Region Rank #3 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 65.8%
Most Likely Finish 25th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.5%
Top 20 at Nationals 19.8%


Regional Champion 2.3%
Top 5 in Regional 82.4%
Top 10 in Regional 99.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Abbabiya Simbassa Brandon Doughty Jacob Burcham Eric Graf Eric Aldritt Alex Deir Zac Randall Will Hogston Kyle Polman Allen Eke
Washington Invitational 10/04 590 31:09 31:30 32:32 32:23 32:57 32:30 33:34 33:18 34:00
Wisconsin adidas Invitational 10/17 565 31:12 31:37 32:13 32:32 32:19 33:46 32:49
Wisconsin adidas Invitational - B 10/17 32:45 34:43
Big 12 Championship 11/01 684 31:43 32:01 32:13 32:30 32:39 32:40 33:07 32:53 33:33
Midwest Region Championships 11/14 761 32:08 31:57 32:40 32:23 32:44 33:36





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 65.8% 22.8 558 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.7 2.0 2.1 2.8 3.5 3.8 4.4 4.8 5.0 5.0 5.2 4.7 5.0 4.2 3.6 2.6 1.6
Region Championship 100% 3.9 137 2.3 21.3 21.7 20.6 16.6 11.4 4.3 1.3 0.4 0.2 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Abbabiya Simbassa 94.0% 43.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.9 0.8 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.4 1.7 1.4
Brandon Doughty 77.3% 78.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.5
Jacob Burcham 65.8% 173.0
Eric Graf 65.8% 179.7
Eric Aldritt 65.8% 201.6
Alex Deir 65.8% 216.8
Zac Randall 65.8% 237.2


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Abbabiya Simbassa 3.9 12.1 13.9 13.4 11.5 9.9 7.2 5.7 4.2 2.9 2.7 2.5 1.7 1.8 1.1 1.1 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.3 0.4
Brandon Doughty 8.6 0.9 2.5 5.1 7.2 8.0 8.6 7.9 6.7 5.4 5.5 4.2 3.6 3.3 3.2 3.1 2.1 1.6 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.0
Jacob Burcham 32.6 0.2 0.0 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.1 1.6 2.3 2.2 2.3 2.2 2.9 2.9 2.6 3.1 2.8 2.6
Eric Graf 35.5 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.9 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.7 2.3 2.0
Eric Aldritt 46.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 1.2 1.0 1.0
Alex Deir 57.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2
Zac Randall 80.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 2.3% 100.0% 2.3 2.3 1
2 21.3% 100.0% 21.3 21.3 2
3 21.7% 96.2% 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.1 2.4 1.8 2.0 2.9 3.0 2.3 2.0 1.1 1.2 0.8 20.8 3
4 20.6% 87.6% 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.4 2.0 2.1 3.4 3.9 2.5 18.0 4
5 16.6% 18.4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.4 1.8 13.5 3.0 5
6 11.4% 2.6% 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 11.1 0.3 6
7 4.3% 4.3 7
8 1.3% 1.3 8
9 0.4% 0.4 9
10 0.2% 0.2 10
11 0.1% 0.1 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 65.8% 2.3 21.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.1 3.5 3.3 3.2 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.5 5.0 7.0 34.2 23.6 42.2




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Villanova 96.6% 1.0 1.0
Washington 96.4% 1.0 1.0
Texas 91.6% 1.0 0.9
Indiana 83.4% 1.0 0.8
North Carolina 70.4% 1.0 0.7
Iowa State 42.0% 2.0 0.8
Minnesota 35.0% 1.0 0.4
Eastern Kentucky 22.6% 1.0 0.2
Princeton 14.7% 1.0 0.1
Lamar 13.6% 1.0 0.1
Illinois 7.6% 1.0 0.1
Texas A&M 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Columbia 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Dartmouth 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 6.2
Minimum 2.0
Maximum 11.0