UTEP
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
11  Anthony Rotich JR 31:09
98  Cosmas Boit SO 31:50
335  Daniel Cheruiyot SO 32:33
605  Elphas Maiyo JR 33:02
1,193  Evans Kiprono SO 33:55
2,566  Ramon Garcia SR 36:07
National Rank #43 of 311
Mountain Region Rank #7 of 18
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 2.4%
Most Likely Finish 9th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.2%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.7%
Top 10 in Regional 99.6%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Anthony Rotich Cosmas Boit Daniel Cheruiyot Elphas Maiyo Evans Kiprono Ramon Garcia
Chili Pepper Festival 10/04 802 31:26 32:01 32:55 32:56 33:39 36:32
ISU Pre-National Invitational (Blue Race) 10/18 787 31:04 31:50 32:39 33:31 35:02 38:06
Conference USA Championship 11/01 867 32:07 32:12 32:30 32:42 34:46 36:44
Mountain Region Championships 11/14 591 30:54 31:31 32:06 32:34 33:14 35:23
NCAA Championship 11/22 757 30:52 31:38 32:34 33:54 35:08 37:37





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 2.4% 25.5 607 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.1
Region Championship 100% 8.2 225 0.0 0.1 0.6 3.9 19.2 31.9 40.0 3.7 0.4 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Anthony Rotich 97.3% 16.4 1.9 3.0 3.9 4.1 3.7 3.2 3.6 3.4 2.9 2.9 3.0 2.8 2.3 2.4 2.6 2.1 2.2 2.0 1.6 2.0 2.0 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.3
Cosmas Boit 50.1% 88.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
Daniel Cheruiyot 2.5% 171.0
Elphas Maiyo 2.4% 214.7
Evans Kiprono 2.4% 247.2
Ramon Garcia 2.5% 250.6


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Anthony Rotich 5.6 8.5 9.8 9.8 8.5 8.6 8.2 8.1 6.2 5.1 4.7 3.3 3.1 2.1 2.2 1.4 1.2 1.2 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4
Cosmas Boit 21.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.4 2.2 3.1 3.6 3.3 3.9 3.8 4.1 4.7 4.0 3.6 3.3 3.8 3.9 3.1 4.0 3.6
Daniel Cheruiyot 44.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2
Elphas Maiyo 58.6
Evans Kiprono 84.8
Ramon Garcia 116.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 3
4 0.1% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 4
5 0.6% 78.1% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.5 5
6 3.9% 46.2% 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 2.1 1.8 6
7 19.2% 0.2% 0.0 0.0 19.2 0.0 7
8 31.9% 31.9 8
9 40.0% 40.0 9
10 3.7% 3.7 10
11 0.4% 0.4 11
12 0.1% 0.1 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
Total 100% 2.4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 97.6 0.0 2.4




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Mid. Tenn. State 1.3% 1.0 0.0
North Texas 0.8% 1.0 0.0
Stephen F. Austin 0.1% 1.0 0.0
South Alabama 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0