Vanderbilt
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,213  John Ewing SR 33:57
1,483  Nick French JR 34:17
1,871  Jake Van Geffen SO 34:49
1,948  Sam Reilly JR 34:57
2,518  Andrew Bachman SR 36:01
2,583  Nikolaos Gkotsis SO 36:09
2,648  Matthew Cleveland SR 36:19
2,847  Andrew Fix JR 36:59
2,997  Sam DeFabrizio FR 37:44
3,146  Dan Henderson SR 39:03
National Rank #223 of 311
South Region Rank #21 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 21st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 42.1%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating John Ewing Nick French Jake Van Geffen Sam Reilly Andrew Bachman Nikolaos Gkotsis Matthew Cleveland Andrew Fix Sam DeFabrizio Dan Henderson
Roy Griak Invitational 09/27 1319 35:02 34:24 35:07 35:45 38:04 37:43 36:46 37:15 39:46
FSU Invitational 10/10 1238 34:14 33:40 34:39 34:47 35:42 36:09 36:18 35:27 37:08
SEC Championships 10/31 1248 33:45 35:04 34:02 34:55 35:37 36:09 35:31 38:53 40:24 38:39
South Region Championships 11/14 1259 33:20 34:13 35:36 34:44 36:01 36:20 37:11





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 20.7 598 0.0 0.6 2.7 9.6 29.2 40.2 12.6 4.1 1.0 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
John Ewing 80.5
Nick French 98.8
Jake Van Geffen 124.6
Sam Reilly 130.2
Andrew Bachman 159.6
Nikolaos Gkotsis 163.2
Matthew Cleveland 167.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 0.0% 0.0 16
17 0.6% 0.6 17
18 2.7% 2.7 18
19 9.6% 9.6 19
20 29.2% 29.2 20
21 40.2% 40.2 21
22 12.6% 12.6 22
23 4.1% 4.1 23
24 1.0% 1.0 24
25 0.1% 0.1 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0