Yale
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
46  Kevin Dooney JR 31:31
316  James Randon SO 32:30
329  Duncan Tomlin JR 32:32
455  Cameron Stanish FR 32:47
464  John McGowan SR 32:48
649  Adam Houston FR 33:06
813  Isa Qasim SR 33:21
984  Jacob Sandry SR 33:37
1,012  Andre Ivankovic SO 33:40
1,235  Casey Celestin FR 33:59
1,267  Ryan Brady FR 34:01
1,348  Matt Chisholm 34:06
1,636  Hale Ross FR 34:30
1,666  Nathaniel Sievert SO 34:32
2,104  Scott Meehan 35:10
2,331  Max Payson JR 35:35
2,646  J.P. Meredith SO 36:19
National Rank #48 of 311
Northeast Region Rank #5 of 41
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.8%
Most Likely Finish 6th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.1%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 34.7%
Top 10 in Regional 99.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Kevin Dooney James Randon Duncan Tomlin Cameron Stanish John McGowan Adam Houston Isa Qasim Jacob Sandry Andre Ivankovic Casey Celestin Ryan Brady
Lehigh Paul Short Run (Gold) 10/04 787 31:47 32:39 32:31 32:26 32:44 33:08 33:41 33:02 34:00
NEICAAA Championship 10/11 1208 33:30 33:44
ISU Pre-National Invitational (Blue Race) 10/18 775 31:42 32:26 32:08 32:59 32:53 33:01 33:50
CCSU Mini Meet 10/24 1185 33:34 33:52 33:54
Ivy League Heptagonal Championships 11/01 870 32:01 32:29 32:47 32:46 32:59 33:08 33:46 34:28 34:08
Northeast Region Championships 11/14 849 31:48 32:25 32:37 32:57 33:12 34:25 33:52
NCAA Championship 11/22 31:10





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.8% 25.5 609 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0
Region Championship 100% 6.2 183 0.1 1.0 14.0 19.5 23.2 20.8 15.5 5.0 0.7 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kevin Dooney 96.5% 47.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.7 0.7 1.0 0.8 1.0 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.1 1.7 1.2 1.5 1.2 1.2 1.6
James Randon 5.6% 168.0
Duncan Tomlin 4.3% 176.3
Cameron Stanish 0.9% 194.3
John McGowan 0.9% 195.3
Adam Houston 0.8% 216.5
Isa Qasim 0.8% 238.2


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Kevin Dooney 5.3 11.1 9.8 9.8 9.1 8.1 7.2 6.0 5.4 4.5 4.5 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.3 2.1 1.5 1.6 1.3 0.9 1.0 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4
James Randon 32.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.4 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.1 3.5
Duncan Tomlin 34.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.3 1.4 2.1 2.2 2.6 2.6 2.8 3.4
Cameron Stanish 48.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.7
John McGowan 49.7 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.7 0.7
Adam Houston 68.4
Isa Qasim 85.7




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 0.1% 100.0% 0.1 0.1 2
3 1.0% 67.3% 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.7 3
4 14.0% 0.1% 0.0 14.0 0.0 4
5 19.5% 19.5 5
6 23.2% 23.2 6
7 20.8% 20.8 7
8 15.5% 15.5 8
9 5.0% 5.0 9
10 0.7% 0.7 10
11 0.1% 0.1 11
12 12
13 0.0% 0.0 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
Total 100% 0.8% 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 99.2 0.1 0.7




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
North Texas 0.8% 1.0 0.0
Texas-Arlington 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Iowa 0.3% 1.0 0.0
Columbia 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Bradley 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 2.0