Houston Baptist
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,257  Juan Fraga SR 34:04
1,350  Carlos Arias JR 34:12
1,640  Enrique Perez JR 34:37
1,945  Orlando Garcia SR 35:03
1,974  Jeremy Lewis SR 35:06
2,770  Daniel Shelton JR 37:24
2,818  Cody Hammonds SO 37:43
National Rank #216 of 312
South Central Region Rank #20 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 20th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 50.6%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Juan Fraga Carlos Arias Enrique Perez Orlando Garcia Jeremy Lewis Daniel Shelton Cody Hammonds
Texas A&M Invitational 09/24 34:04 35:22 35:11 35:55
Houston Baptist Invitational 10/07 1232 34:17 33:34 34:07 34:55 35:35 37:45
Alabama Crimson Classic 10/14 1329 34:00 34:32 35:18 34:59 38:41
Southland Conference Championships 10/28 1219 34:04 34:15 33:44 35:07 34:39 37:11 36:53
South Central Region Championships 11/11 1283 34:18 35:27 35:39 34:27 35:22





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 20.7 548 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 2.1 5.1 11.3 30.7 19.7 13.2 9.1 4.9 2.5 0.2



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Juan Fraga 80.7
Carlos Arias 87.6
Enrique Perez 108.2
Orlando Garcia 128.0
Jeremy Lewis 130.7
Daniel Shelton 192.6
Cody Hammonds 199.4




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 0.1% 0.1 13
14 0.2% 0.2 14
15 0.5% 0.5 15
16 0.8% 0.8 16
17 2.1% 2.1 17
18 5.1% 5.1 18
19 11.3% 11.3 19
20 30.7% 30.7 20
21 19.7% 19.7 21
22 13.2% 13.2 22
23 9.1% 9.1 23
24 4.9% 4.9 24
25 2.5% 2.5 25
26 0.2% 0.2 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0