Marshall
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
748  Daniel Green SO 33:23
1,392  Alex Minor FR 34:15
1,397  William Shaffer JR 34:16
1,409  William Hayes JR 34:16
1,670  Nickolas Schmidt SO 34:40
2,244  Drake Seccurro SR 35:40
2,314  Nick Salmons FR 35:48
2,363  Hunter Deem FR 35:55
2,413  Logan Kerby FR 36:03
2,587  Jeremiah Parlock FR 36:37
2,742  Joe Schwartz SO 37:16
National Rank #196 of 312
Mid-Atlantic Region Rank #18 of 33
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 18th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 87.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Daniel Green Alex Minor William Shaffer William Hayes Nickolas Schmidt Drake Seccurro Nick Salmons Hunter Deem Logan Kerby Jeremiah Parlock Joe Schwartz
Commadore Classic 09/17 1184 33:29 33:16 34:40 34:23 34:19 35:28 36:36 36:09 36:26 36:50 37:28
Joe Piane Invitational (Gold) 09/30 1208 33:33 33:37 34:40 34:26 34:53 35:09 36:03 35:47
High Point Vert Invitational 10/14 1204 33:12 34:54 34:03 34:20 36:25 34:50 35:14 35:26 36:16 36:24 37:25
Conference USA Championship 10/29 1174 32:56 34:38 33:44 33:52 34:56 35:29 35:45 36:04 35:34
Mid-Atlantic Region Championships 11/11 1176 33:04 34:40 34:16 33:47 34:18 37:22 36:15





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 17.7 497 0.2 0.8 7.6 11.2 13.5 14.4 14.8 13.2 11.6 9.1 3.9 0.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Daniel Green 52.7 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1
Alex Minor 102.3
William Shaffer 103.9
William Hayes 104.3
Nickolas Schmidt 123.5
Drake Seccurro 158.0
Nick Salmons 161.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 0.2% 0.2 12
13 0.8% 0.8 13
14 7.6% 7.6 14
15 11.2% 11.2 15
16 13.5% 13.5 16
17 14.4% 14.4 17
18 14.8% 14.8 18
19 13.2% 13.2 19
20 11.6% 11.6 20
21 9.1% 9.1 21
22 3.9% 3.9 22
23 0.1% 0.1 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0