Mercer
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,177  Ahmed Jama SO 33:58
2,498  Cameron Gatt JR 36:20
2,556  Michael Rowlands FR 36:30
2,591  Mark Brannen JR 36:38
2,667  McHenry Power SO 36:55
2,750  Abraham Balawi SO 37:17
2,829  Sam Gelabert FR 37:47
2,851  Justin Hanson SO 37:54
2,875  Marc Reiser FR 38:05
2,930  Jackson Tribou FR 38:38
3,012  John Fravel FR 40:03
National Rank #268 of 312
South Region Rank #28 of 40
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 28th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Ahmed Jama Cameron Gatt Michael Rowlands Mark Brannen McHenry Power Abraham Balawi Sam Gelabert Justin Hanson Marc Reiser Jackson Tribou John Fravel
JSU Foothills Invitational 10/01 1394 33:35 36:34 36:24 37:07 37:04 37:03 37:58 37:52 38:15 38:27 39:56
Berry Invitational 10/15 1396 34:05 39:03 36:14 36:57 36:29 37:10 38:13 37:40 37:33 39:06 40:26
Southern Conference Championship 10/29 1390 34:42 36:00 36:31 36:26 36:58 37:56 37:19 38:02 38:10
South Region Championships 11/11 36:48





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 28.0 897 0.3 2.7 18.5 63.9 10.6 2.8 0.8



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Ahmed Jama 84.5
Cameron Gatt 192.7
Michael Rowlands 198.5
Mark Brannen 202.4
McHenry Power 211.3
Abraham Balawi 219.8
Sam Gelabert 229.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 0.3% 0.3 25
26 2.7% 2.7 26
27 18.5% 18.5 27
28 63.9% 63.9 28
29 10.6% 10.6 29
30 2.8% 2.8 30
31 0.8% 0.8 31
32 0.4% 0.4 32
33 0.2% 0.2 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0