Sam Houston St.
Men -
Women
2015
-
2016 -
2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
498 |
Chris Speaks |
SR |
32:55 |
982 |
Evan Arambula |
SR |
33:42 |
1,367 |
Grant Buley |
JR |
34:14 |
1,588 |
Jeffrey Moore |
SO |
34:32 |
1,760 |
Alex Hernandez |
SO |
34:46 |
2,438 |
John Bounds |
SR |
36:10 |
2,464 |
Cameron Theriot |
FR |
36:14 |
2,512 |
Robert Monticone |
SR |
36:21 |
|
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
1.7% |
Top 20 in Regional |
99.7% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Chris Speaks |
Evan Arambula |
Grant Buley |
Jeffrey Moore |
Alex Hernandez |
John Bounds |
Cameron Theriot |
Robert Monticone |
Texas A&M Invitational |
09/24 |
1274 |
35:07 |
33:30 |
33:52 |
36:08 |
|
35:49 |
36:19 |
36:27 |
Aggieland Open |
10/07 |
1174 |
32:57 |
33:18 |
34:53 |
34:31 |
34:39 |
36:32 |
36:06 |
36:15 |
Southland Conference Championships |
10/28 |
1204 |
33:19 |
33:45 |
33:54 |
34:20 |
35:36 |
36:04 |
36:05 |
36:17 |
South Central Region Championships |
11/11 |
1109 |
32:15 |
34:02 |
34:37 |
33:58 |
34:28 |
37:12 |
36:36 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
14.8 |
417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
0.4 |
1.1 |
3.5 |
8.7 |
18.3 |
16.2 |
16.0 |
12.5 |
10.2 |
7.9 |
3.9 |
1.1 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
---|
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Chris Speaks |
0.3% |
196.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Chris Speaks |
29.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.6 |
2.7 |
3.1 |
2.8 |
3.4 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
3.7 |
Evan Arambula |
62.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Buley |
89.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeffrey Moore |
105.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alex Hernandez |
115.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
John Bounds |
166.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cameron Theriot |
168.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
0.2% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
8 |
9 |
0.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
9 |
10 |
1.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
10 |
11 |
3.5% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
11 |
12 |
8.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
12 |
13 |
18.3% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
16.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
14 |
15 |
16.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
12.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
10.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
7.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
3.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
1.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
0.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
22 |
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |