UNC-Greensboro
Men - Women
2015 - 2016 - 2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,891  Bryan Whyms JR 34:58
1,918  Dakarai Shipp SR 35:01
1,946  William Sandin SO 35:03
2,035  Brandon King JR 35:12
2,096  Luke Sumerford JR 35:20
2,296  David Guthrie SR 35:46
2,386  Trelek Jones FR 35:58
2,590  Patrick O'Grady SR 36:38
2,739  Robel Tecle SO 37:15
National Rank #237 of 312
Southeast Region Rank #31 of 48
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 33rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Bryan Whyms Dakarai Shipp William Sandin Brandon King Luke Sumerford David Guthrie Trelek Jones Patrick O'Grady Robel Tecle
Joe Piane Invitational (Gold) 09/30 1246 34:48 35:00 35:09 35:01 33:55 34:34
Royals XC Challenge 10/07 35:38 35:50
Princeton Invitational 10/15 1270 34:33 35:04 34:32 34:56 35:31 36:31 35:48 37:41
Southern Conference Championship 10/29 1280 35:16 34:56 35:13 34:56 34:47 35:43 36:16 36:48 37:15
Southeast Region Championships 11/11 1325 35:28 35:11 35:31 35:39 38:45 35:35 39:25





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 33.6 981 0.1 0.1 0.9 2.9 6.4 8.0 9.7



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Bryan Whyms 185.7
Dakarai Shipp 189.4
William Sandin 190.8
Brandon King 200.3
Luke Sumerford 208.5
David Guthrie 232.9
Trelek Jones 241.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 0.1% 0.1 25
26 0.1% 0.1 26
27 0.9% 0.9 27
28 2.9% 2.9 28
29 6.4% 6.4 29
30 8.0% 8.0 30
31 9.7% 9.7 31
32 10.8% 10.8 32
33 12.5% 12.5 33
34 10.7% 10.7 34
35 10.4% 10.4 35
36 8.8% 8.8 36
37 6.8% 6.8 37
38 5.3% 5.3 38
39 3.5% 3.5 39
40 2.3% 2.3 40
41 1.0% 1.0 41
42 0.3% 0.3 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0