Elon
Men - Women
2011 - 2012 - 2013
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
710  Allyson Oram JR 21:14
717  Elyse Bierut FR 21:14
866  Haylee Dawe SO 21:24
882  Tereza Novotna SO 21:25
1,072  Emily Tryon SR 21:39
1,176  Chrissy Pacewicz SR 21:46
1,332  Kaitlin Snapp FR 21:56
1,976  Caroline McCaslin FR 22:36
2,119  Julie Hart SO 22:47
2,244  Erin MacBeth JR 22:55
2,316  Sabina Bains FR 23:01
2,331  Kaitlin Stober SO 23:01
2,608  Amanda Parker JR 23:23
2,637  Kylie Womack JR 23:25
2,666  Brennan McDavid JR 23:27
2,699  Jenny Gallagher SO 23:30
2,878  Ellie Taff JR 23:46
2,935  Jackie Madden JR 23:53
National Rank #142 of 339
Southeast Region Rank #18 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 16th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 12.7%
Top 20 in Regional 98.4%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Allyson Oram Elyse Bierut Haylee Dawe Tereza Novotna Emily Tryon Chrissy Pacewicz Kaitlin Snapp Caroline McCaslin Julie Hart Erin MacBeth Sabina Bains
Charlotte Invitational (Gold) 09/28 1171 22:08 21:31 21:01 21:08 21:44 21:37 22:05 23:12
Charlotte Invitational (Green) 09/28 1343 23:39 22:29
Queens Royals Challenge 10/12 1300 22:35 22:47 22:24 23:34
Pre-Nationals Meet (Red) 10/13 1170 21:03 21:03 21:39 21:35 21:37 21:57 22:01
Southern Conference Championships 10/27 1171 21:14 21:10 21:28 21:13 21:43 21:42 21:47 21:51 23:06
Southeast Region Championships 11/09 1180 21:03 21:22 21:23 21:46 21:35 21:48 21:54





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 14.3 435 0.0 0.1 0.3 1.7 4.5 6.1 7.5 8.7 10.0 10.9 11.5 12.0 10.9 8.1 4.2 1.8 1.0 0.4 0.1 0.1 0.0



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Allyson Oram 70.8 0.0 0.0
Elyse Bierut 71.8 0.0
Haylee Dawe 86.3
Tereza Novotna 89.1
Emily Tryon 113.7
Chrissy Pacewicz 125.8
Kaitlin Snapp 143.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 0.0% 0.0 4
5 5
6 0.1% 0.1 6
7 0.3% 0.3 7
8 1.7% 1.7 8
9 4.5% 4.5 9
10 6.1% 6.1 10
11 7.5% 7.5 11
12 8.7% 8.7 12
13 10.0% 10.0 13
14 10.9% 10.9 14
15 11.5% 11.5 15
16 12.0% 12.0 16
17 10.9% 10.9 17
18 8.1% 8.1 18
19 4.2% 4.2 19
20 1.8% 1.8 20
21 1.0% 1.0 21
22 0.4% 0.4 22
23 0.1% 0.1 23
24 0.1% 0.1 24
25 0.0% 0.0 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0