UNC-Asheville
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
778  Melanie Kulesz SR 21:18
1,322  Sarah Heisner FR 21:54
1,451  Erin Dalton SO 22:01
1,884  Adrian Etheridge JR 22:27
2,138  Kelsie Rubino SO 22:45
2,166  Scarlett Beamon SO 22:46
2,195  Kylie Smith SR 22:48
2,428  Katie Gamble FR 23:05
2,511  Kasey Briggs SO 23:07
2,725  Alyssa Lashway SO 23:25
3,625  Marissa Banks FR 26:02
National Rank #209 of 340
Southeast Region Rank #26 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 27th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.4%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Melanie Kulesz Sarah Heisner Erin Dalton Adrian Etheridge Kelsie Rubino Scarlett Beamon Kylie Smith Katie Gamble Kasey Briggs Alyssa Lashway Marissa Banks
Mountaineer Open 10/04 1239 21:25 21:56 21:56 22:14 22:37 22:44 22:08 22:51 23:21 23:25 26:02
Blue Ridge Open 10/18 1231 21:08 21:48 22:17 23:04 22:28 22:32 23:00 22:50
Big South Championships 11/02 1242 21:56 21:55 21:25 22:13 23:45 22:57 22:36 24:20 23:12
Southeast Region Championships 11/15 1248 21:02 21:58 22:21 22:58 23:24 22:50





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 27.7 820 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.6 3.6 6.6 11.0 12.3 13.1 12.8 11.5 9.9 6.6



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Melanie Kulesz 91.2
Sarah Heisner 145.2
Erin Dalton 158.0
Adrian Etheridge 204.4
Kelsie Rubino 229.6
Scarlett Beamon 231.6
Kylie Smith 233.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 0.0% 0.0 18
19 0.1% 0.1 19
20 0.3% 0.3 20
21 0.7% 0.7 21
22 1.6% 1.6 22
23 3.6% 3.6 23
24 6.6% 6.6 24
25 11.0% 11.0 25
26 12.3% 12.3 26
27 13.1% 13.1 27
28 12.8% 12.8 28
29 11.5% 11.5 29
30 9.9% 9.9 30
31 6.6% 6.6 31
32 5.1% 5.1 32
33 2.5% 2.5 33
34 1.4% 1.4 34
35 0.7% 0.7 35
36 0.2% 0.2 36
37 0.0% 0.0 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0