UNC-Asheville
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,266  Erin Dalton JR 21:50
1,961  Sarah Heisner SO 22:32
2,075  Adrian Etheridge SR 22:39
2,108  Phoebe Schneider FR 22:41
2,143  Scarlett Beamon JR 22:43
2,263  Kasey Briggs JR 22:51
2,543  Kelsie Rubino JR 23:11
2,562  Alyssa Lashway JR 23:13
2,673  Maddie Lowe FR 23:23
2,976  Casey Greenwalt FR 23:53
2,996  Amy Castle SO 23:55
3,119  Marissa Banks SO 24:11
National Rank #238 of 341
Southeast Region Rank #31 of 49
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 31st at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Erin Dalton Sarah Heisner Adrian Etheridge Phoebe Schneider Scarlett Beamon Kasey Briggs Kelsie Rubino Alyssa Lashway Maddie Lowe Casey Greenwalt Amy Castle
Upstate Invitational 10/04 1281 21:48 22:44 22:47 22:36 22:42 22:55 23:11 23:06 23:22 22:47
Big South Conference Championships 11/01 1270 21:54 21:57 22:35 22:41 22:44 23:20 24:58 23:56
Southeast Region Championships 11/14 1282 21:48 22:42 22:34 22:46 22:52





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 30.7 926 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.3 1.1 1.6 3.1 5.8 10.1 15.3 26.1



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Erin Dalton 130.0
Sarah Heisner 191.7
Adrian Etheridge 202.7
Phoebe Schneider 204.4
Scarlett Beamon 207.5
Kasey Briggs 218.1
Kelsie Rubino 238.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 0.0% 0.0 21
22 0.1% 0.1 22
23 0.3% 0.3 23
24 0.3% 0.3 24
25 1.1% 1.1 25
26 1.6% 1.6 26
27 3.1% 3.1 27
28 5.8% 5.8 28
29 10.1% 10.1 29
30 15.3% 15.3 30
31 26.1% 26.1 31
32 21.7% 21.7 32
33 9.7% 9.7 33
34 3.5% 3.5 34
35 1.2% 1.2 35
36 0.1% 0.1 36
37 0.1% 0.1 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0