Lamar
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
101  Leigh Lattimore JR 20:03
275  Louise Webb JR 20:33
479  Rachel Robinson JR 20:55
849  Claire Arnold JR 21:23
944  Kayla DeBondt FR 21:29
1,509  Hannah Alderson JR 22:04
1,867  Belinda Aguilar FR 22:26
1,911  Megan Flanagan FR 22:29
2,297  Kaitlynn Warren SO 22:55
National Rank #69 of 340
South Central Region Rank #5 of 36
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 1.3%
Most Likely Finish 7th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 37.2%
Top 10 in Regional 99.8%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings



Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.



RaceDateTeam Rating Leigh Lattimore Louise Webb Rachel Robinson Claire Arnold Kayla DeBondt Hannah Alderson Belinda Aguilar Megan Flanagan Kaitlynn Warren
Notre Dame Invitational (Blue) 10/04 839 19:46 20:21 20:47 21:32 21:16 22:11 22:39 23:12
HBU Invitational 10/11 22:43
Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/19 940 20:05 20:46 20:49 21:11 21:35 22:20 22:41
Southland Championships 11/01 967 20:14 20:36 20:59 21:17 21:33 22:05 22:48 22:22
South Central Region Championships 11/15 966 20:10 20:28 21:11 21:43 21:35 22:35 22:16





NCAA Tournament Simulation



Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.




Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 1.3% 28.3 692 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2
Region Championship 100% 5.9 175 1.2 5.0 11.6 19.4 24.7 30.0 6.1 1.5 0.3 0.1 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Leigh Lattimore 59.0% 86.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1
Louise Webb 2.4% 133.8
Rachel Robinson 1.3% 187.8
Claire Arnold 1.3% 235.1
Kayla DeBondt 1.3% 237.8
Hannah Alderson 1.3% 250.2
Belinda Aguilar 1.3% 252.2


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Leigh Lattimore 8.2 0.1 1.0 2.4 3.6 7.2 10.6 12.0 11.1 10.3 8.7 7.1 6.6 5.7 3.9 2.8 1.6 1.5 1.2 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1
Louise Webb 20.6 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.5 2.4 2.9 3.4 3.6 4.4 5.0 5.3 5.8 5.4 5.6 5.4 5.8 4.7 4.5 4.7
Rachel Robinson 33.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.3 1.8 1.8 2.5 2.8
Claire Arnold 51.2 0.0 0.0 0.0
Kayla DeBondt 56.7
Hannah Alderson 85.6
Belinda Aguilar 102.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 1.2% 100.0% 1.2 1.2 2
3 5.0% 2.0% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 4.9 0.1 3
4 11.6% 11.6 4
5 19.4% 19.4 5
6 24.7% 24.7 6
7 30.0% 30.0 7
8 6.1% 6.1 8
9 1.5% 1.5 9
10 0.3% 0.3 10
11 0.1% 0.1 11
12 0.0% 0.0 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
Total 100% 1.3% 1.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 98.7 1.2 0.1




Points




At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.




Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Baylor 3.8% 2.0 0.1
UTSA 2.6% 1.0 0.0
Lipscomb 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Ohio State 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Tulsa 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Kentucky 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Kansas 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Northwestern 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.1
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 3.0