Lamar
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
104  Minttu Hukka FR 20:04
176  Leigh Lattimore SR 20:20
278  Verity Ockenden JR 20:34
365  Jannika John JR 20:44
591  Evelyn Chavez FR 21:03
1,439  Megan Flanagan SO 22:00
1,895  Louise Webb SR 22:28
2,091  Belinda Aguilar SO 22:40
2,162  Kaitlynn Warren JR 22:44
2,204  Chaynee Atwood FR 22:47
2,349  Angela LaBorde SR 22:57
2,449  Claire Arnold SR 23:04
2,887  Alexandra Sokolova FR 23:45
National Rank #39 of 341
South Central Region Rank #4 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 17.0%
Most Likely Finish 3rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 2.4%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 97.9%
Top 10 in Regional 100.0%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Minttu Hukka Leigh Lattimore Verity Ockenden Jannika John Evelyn Chavez Megan Flanagan Louise Webb Belinda Aguilar Kaitlynn Warren Chaynee Atwood Angela LaBorde
Chile Pepper Festival 10/04 839 20:21 20:15 20:34 20:59 21:07 22:09 22:25 22:47 22:56
ISU Pre-National Invitational (Blue) 10/18 698 19:59 20:22 20:35 20:25 20:48 22:13 23:00
Southland Conference Championships 11/03 774 19:53 20:30 20:40 20:35 21:04 21:54 22:39 22:44
South Central Region Championships 11/14 813 20:10 20:18 20:28 20:57 21:13 21:44 22:28





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 17.0% 25.9 608 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.9 1.1 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.8 1.7 2.5 2.0
Region Championship 100% 3.5 127 0.0 6.2 47.9 35.3 8.4 1.5 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Minttu Hukka 35.8% 78.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1
Leigh Lattimore 19.0% 119.3
Verity Ockenden 17.1% 159.8
Jannika John 17.0% 185.6
Evelyn Chavez 17.0% 219.9
Megan Flanagan 17.0% 249.7
Louise Webb 17.1% 252.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Minttu Hukka 11.9 0.1 0.9 1.9 2.6 3.0 4.1 5.5 6.7 8.2 8.7 9.9 10.8 10.1 8.4 5.6 4.2 2.6 2.3 1.6 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.2
Leigh Lattimore 16.7 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 0.9 1.9 2.6 4.5 5.7 8.0 8.7 9.3 9.1 7.9 7.4 6.2 5.0 4.1 3.6 2.9 2.5
Verity Ockenden 22.6 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.4 2.7 4.0 4.6 5.3 6.5 6.3 6.8 6.8 6.4 6.1 5.3
Jannika John 28.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.8 0.9 1.8 2.4 2.9 3.5 4.2 4.4 5.1 5.1
Evelyn Chavez 41.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.7
Megan Flanagan 90.5
Louise Webb 112.9




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.0% 100.0% 0.0 0.0 1
2 6.2% 100.0% 6.2 6.2 2
3 47.9% 20.5% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.3 2.3 3.4 1.4 38.1 9.8 3
4 35.3% 2.5% 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 34.4 0.9 4
5 8.4% 0.2% 0.0 8.4 0.0 5
6 1.5% 1.5 6
7 0.6% 0.6 7
8 0.0% 0.0 8
9 0.0% 0.0 9
10 0.0% 0.0 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
Total 100% 17.0% 0.0 6.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.7 1.4 2.4 3.5 2.0 83.0 6.3 10.7




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Penn State 17.1% 1.0 0.2
Tulsa 7.4% 1.0 0.1
Bradley 4.7% 1.0 0.0
Yale 2.9% 1.0 0.0
Missouri 2.0% 1.0 0.0
Lipscomb 1.0% 1.0 0.0
California 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Wyoming 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Rice 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Northern Arizona 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Kansas State 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Colorado St. 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Utah 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Butler 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Connecticut 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Furman 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Elon 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Eastern Kentucky 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.4
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 4.0