Cincinnati
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
1,579  Ashley Earman SR 22:08
1,865  Lauren Goodwin SR 22:26
2,374  Erin Kennedy FR 22:58
2,457  Anne Pace JR 23:05
2,678  Meg Westerheide FR 23:23
2,728  Madison Dunlap FR 23:28
2,786  Lianne Masquelier FR 23:34
2,913  Ari Surles FR 23:46
3,291  Hannah Christ JR 24:39
3,302  Maggie Bischoff JR 24:41
3,318  Annette Brickman SO 24:44
National Rank #258 of 341
Great Lakes Region Rank #29 of 34
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 29th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Ashley Earman Lauren Goodwin Erin Kennedy Anne Pace Meg Westerheide Madison Dunlap Lianne Masquelier Ari Surles Hannah Christ Maggie Bischoff Annette Brickman
Greater Louisville Classic (Gold) 10/04 1291 22:00 22:26 22:50 23:17 22:51 22:52 23:52 23:11 24:38 24:58 24:44
ISU Pre-National Invitational (White) 10/18 1324 22:18 22:45 22:57 22:56 23:25 23:38 24:08
American Athletic Conference Championships 10/31 1311 22:08 22:14 23:04 23:11 23:52 23:28 22:56 23:35 24:25
Great Lakes Region Championships 11/14 1329 22:07 22:22 23:04 22:59 23:47 23:43 24:08





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 29.0 876 0.0 0.1 0.6 4.3 16.1 20.1 22.1 16.4 10.7



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Ashley Earman 133.4
Lauren Goodwin 157.6
Erin Kennedy 189.8
Anne Pace 194.6
Meg Westerheide 205.5
Madison Dunlap 208.4
Lianne Masquelier 211.0




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 0.0% 0.0 23
24 0.1% 0.1 24
25 0.6% 0.6 25
26 4.3% 4.3 26
27 16.1% 16.1 27
28 20.1% 20.1 28
29 22.1% 22.1 29
30 16.4% 16.4 30
31 10.7% 10.7 31
32 6.8% 6.8 32
33 2.5% 2.5 33
34 0.3% 0.3 34
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0