Grambling
Men - Women
2013 - 2014 - 2015
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
3,206  Faith Early JR 24:24
3,455  Brooklynn Allison FR 25:21
3,554  Jasmine Pierce JR 25:52
3,556  Tichina Lewis FR 25:52
3,620  Muridia Washington JR 26:19
3,630  Yolonda Decker-Williams FR 26:25
National Rank #328 of 341
South Central Region Rank #32 of 35
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 33rd at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 0.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Faith Early Brooklynn Allison Jasmine Pierce Tichina Lewis Muridia Washington Yolonda Decker-Williams
Northwestern State Pre-Conference 10/06 1813 24:44 26:16 27:20 25:49 27:36 26:45
Choctaw Open 10/18 1697 24:21 25:09 25:24 26:05 26:02 26:26





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 32.1 1016 3.8 9.0 18.7



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Faith Early 184.9
Brooklynn Allison 199.0
Jasmine Pierce 208.0
Tichina Lewis 208.2
Muridia Washington 215.2
Yolonda Decker-Williams 216.5




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 3.8% 3.8 29
30 9.0% 9.0 30
31 18.7% 18.7 31
32 23.8% 23.8 32
33 27.9% 27.9 33
34 16.0% 16.0 34
35 0.8% 0.8 35
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 0.0